• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与威胁相关的面部表情的错误归因偏差与精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的病程较长及执行功能较差有关。

Misattribution bias of threat-related facial expressions is related to a longer duration of illness and poor executive function in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

作者信息

Premkumar Preethi, Cooke Michael A, Fannon Dominic, Peters Emmanuelle, Michel Tanja M, Aasen Ingrid, Murray Robin M, Kuipers Elizabeth, Kumari Veena

机构信息

Department of Psychology, PO78, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.10.004
PMID:18201874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3103823/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While it is known that patients with schizophrenia recognize facial emotions, specifically negative emotions, less accurately, little is known about how they misattribute these emotions to other emotions and whether such misattribution biases are associated with symptoms, course of the disorder, or certain cognitive functions.

METHOD

Outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n=73) and healthy controls (n=30) performed a computerised Facial Emotion Attribution Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Patients were also rated on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Patients were poor at recognizing fearful and angry emotions and attributed fear to angry and angry to neutral expressions. Fear-as-anger misattributions were predicted independently by a longer duration of illness and WCST perseverative errors.

CONCLUSION

The findings show a bias towards misattributing fearful and angry facial emotions. The propensity for fear-as-anger misattribution biases increases as the length of time that the disorder is experienced increases and a more rigid style of information processing is used. This, at least in part, may be perpetuated by subtle fearfulness expressed by others while interacting with people with schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

虽然已知精神分裂症患者识别面部情绪,尤其是负面情绪的准确性较低,但对于他们如何将这些情绪错误归因于其他情绪,以及这种错误归因偏差是否与症状、疾病进程或某些认知功能相关,却知之甚少。

方法

对患有精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍的门诊患者(n = 73)和健康对照者(n = 30)进行了计算机化面部情绪归因测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)。还使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)对患者进行了评分。

结果

患者在识别恐惧和愤怒情绪方面表现较差,将恐惧归因于愤怒,将愤怒归因于中性表情。恐惧误归为愤怒的情况由病程较长和WCST持续性错误独立预测。

结论

研究结果显示出对面部恐惧和愤怒情绪的错误归因倾向。随着患病时间的延长以及采用更僵化的信息处理方式,恐惧误归为愤怒的归因偏差倾向会增加。这至少部分可能是由于与精神分裂症患者互动时他人表现出的微妙恐惧情绪而持续存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0e1/3103823/28178ef65764/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0e1/3103823/28178ef65764/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0e1/3103823/28178ef65764/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Misattribution bias of threat-related facial expressions is related to a longer duration of illness and poor executive function in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.与威胁相关的面部表情的错误归因偏差与精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍的病程较长及执行功能较差有关。
Eur Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
2
Emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and psychotic bipolar disorder: Findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) study.精神分裂症谱系障碍和精神病性双相情感障碍中的情绪识别缺陷:双相情感障碍-精神分裂症中间型网络(B-SNIP)研究的结果
Schizophr Res. 2014 Sep;158(1-3):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
3
Attribution biases in schizophrenia: relationship to clinical and functional impairments.精神分裂症中的归因偏差:与临床和功能损害的关系。
Psychopathology. 2009;42(1):40-6. doi: 10.1159/000173702. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
4
Deficits in Degraded Facial Affect Labeling in Schizophrenia and Borderline Personality Disorder.精神分裂症和边缘型人格障碍患者在面部表情标签识别能力下降方面存在缺陷。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 14;11(6):e0154145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154145. eCollection 2016.
5
Schizophrenia patients with a history of severe violence differ from nonviolent schizophrenia patients in perception of emotions but not cognitive function.有严重暴力史的精神分裂症患者与非暴力精神分裂症患者在情绪感知方面存在差异,但在认知功能上并无不同。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;66(3):300-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0305.
6
Facial emotion perception differs in young persons at genetic and clinical high-risk for psychosis.年轻的遗传和临床精神病高危人群的面部情绪感知存在差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 May 15;216(2):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
7
[Measuring impairment of facial affects recognition in schizophrenia. Preliminary study of the facial emotions recognition task (TREF)].[测量精神分裂症患者面部表情识别障碍。面部情绪识别任务(TREF)的初步研究]
Encephale. 2015 Jun;41(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
8
[Recognition of facial emotions and theory of mind in schizophrenia: could the theory of mind deficit be due to the non-recognition of facial emotions?].[精神分裂症患者对面部表情的识别与心理理论:心理理论缺陷是否归因于对面部表情的识别障碍?]
Encephale. 2012 Jun;38(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern.精神分裂症中的面部情绪识别:强度效应和错误模式。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;160(10):1768-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.10.1768.

引用本文的文献

1
Moderation Effect of Emotional Expressivity on the Associations Between Schizotypal Traits, Autistic Traits and Social Pleasure.情绪表达能力对分裂型特质、自闭症特质与社交愉悦感之间关联的调节作用。
Psych J. 2025 Aug;14(4):545-559. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70003. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Facial Emotion Recognition and its Associations With Psychological Well-Being Across Four Schizotypal Dimensions: a Cross-Sectional Study.面部表情识别及其与精神分裂症四个维度心理健康的关联:一项横断面研究。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Jul 25;40(5):965-976. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae123.
3
How to elicit a negative bias? Manipulating contrast and saturation with the facial emotion salience task.

本文引用的文献

1
Fronto-limbic and autonomic disjunctions to negative emotion distinguish schizophrenia subtypes.前额叶-边缘叶及自主神经对负性情绪的分离可区分精神分裂症亚型。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 May 15;155(1):29-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.12.018. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
2
Emotional processing in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的情绪加工
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2006 May;11(3):250-71. doi: 10.1080/13546800500188575.
3
Functional disconnections in the direct and indirect amygdala pathways for fear processing in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中恐惧加工的杏仁核直接和间接通路的功能连接中断
如何引发消极偏见?通过面部情绪显著性任务操纵对比度和饱和度。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 29;15:1284595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284595. eCollection 2024.
4
Emotional anticipation for dynamic emotional faces is not modulated by schizotypal traits: A Representational Momentum study.分裂型特质不会调节对动态情绪面孔的情绪预期:一项表象动量研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1088-1106. doi: 10.1177/17470218241253703. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Visualizing threat and trustworthiness prior beliefs in face perception in high versus low paranoia.可视化高偏执与低偏执状态下对面部感知中威胁和可信度的先验信念。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Mar 20;10(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00459-z.
6
Social cognition training improves recognition of distinct facial emotions and decreases misattribution errors in healthy individuals.社交认知训练可提高健康个体对不同面部表情的识别能力,并减少错误归因。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 4;13:1026418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026418. eCollection 2022.
7
Processing of Spoken Emotions in Schizophrenia: Forensic and Non-forensic Patients Differ in Emotional Identification and Integration but Not in Selective Attention.精神分裂症患者对言语情绪的处理:法医鉴定患者与非法医鉴定患者在情绪识别与整合方面存在差异,但在选择性注意方面无差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 21;13:847455. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.847455. eCollection 2022.
8
Dysregulated affective arousal regulates reward-based decision making in patients with schizophrenia: an integrated study.情感唤醒失调对精神分裂症患者基于奖励的决策的影响:一项综合研究。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 Mar 21;8(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00234-y.
9
Disease-Specific Contribution of Pulvinar Dysfunction to Impaired Emotion Recognition in Schizophrenia.丘脑枕功能障碍对精神分裂症患者情绪识别受损的疾病特异性影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 14;15:787383. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.787383. eCollection 2021.
10
Processing of Emotions in Speech in Forensic Patients With Schizophrenia: Impairments in Identification, Selective Attention, and Integration of Speech Channels.精神分裂症法医患者言语中情绪的处理:言语通道识别、选择性注意和整合方面的损伤
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 13;11:601763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.601763. eCollection 2020.
Schizophr Res. 2007 Feb;90(1-3):284-94. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
4
Frontal lobe volumes in schizophrenia: effects of stage and duration of illness.精神分裂症患者的额叶体积:疾病阶段和病程的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Oct;40(7):627-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
5
Neural responses to dynamic expressions of fear in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者对恐惧动态表情的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):107-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.026. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
6
Impairment in the specificity of emotion processing in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者情绪加工特异性受损。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;163(3):442-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.442.
7
Attributional style in psychosis--the role of affect and belief type.精神病中的归因风格——情感与信念类型的作用
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Nov;44(11):1597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
8
Perception of facial and vocal affect by people with schizophrenia in early and late stages of illness.精神分裂症患者在疾病早期和晚期对面部及声音情感的感知。
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;187:523-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.6.523.
9
Schizophrenia patients with a history of severe violence differ from nonviolent schizophrenia patients in perception of emotions but not cognitive function.有严重暴力史的精神分裂症患者与非暴力精神分裂症患者在情绪感知方面存在差异,但在认知功能上并无不同。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;66(3):300-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0305.
10
Emotion recognition, 'theory of mind,' and social behavior in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的情绪识别、“心理理论”与社会行为
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Feb 28;133(2-3):135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.10.007.