Zhu Qin, Cao Qian, Si Jian-Min
Department of Gastoenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan 28;14(4):612-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.612.
To investigate the quality of care for a hospital based-cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from East China according to the current practice guidelines.
A retrospective review was conducted, involving 177 patients with IBD admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University between June 2000 and June 2006. Data regarding demographic and clinical characteristics as well as medical therapy including use of oral aminosalisylates, topical therapy, corticosteroid agents, immunomodulatory agents (such as azathioprine) at admission and outpatient clinic visit were analyzed.
A total of 177 eligible patients were evaluated in this study, including 71 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 106 with ulcerative colitis (UC). All were the Han nationality Chinese with active disease at baseline. All the 106 patients with ulcerative colitis received optimal doses of aminosalisylate while 27 of 68 (39.7%) patients with ileal or colonic CD received the suboptimal doses of aminosalisylate. The incidence of suboptimal dose of aminosalisylate was significantly higher in CD patients with small intestine involvement only (52.8% vs 25.0%, P=0.019). Thirty-one (54.4%) patients with active distal or left-sided ulcerative colitis received topical therapy, and 27.8% of patients suffering from severe inflammatory bowel disease did not receive oral or intravenous steroid therapy. Among the 51 patients for whom thiopurine was indicated, only 10 (19.6%) received immunomodulatory agents, and more than half of the 8 patients received a suboptimal dose of azathiopurine with no attempt to increase its dosage.
The quality of care for IBD patients can be further improved. A suboptimal dose of aminosalicylate is used in treatment of patients with CD, especially in those with small intestine involved only. Topical mesalazine is inadequately used in patients with distal or left-sided colitis. Oral or intravenous steroid therapy is not used in some patients with severe IBD. Use of immunomodulatory medication is limited. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the quality of care for patients with IBD to establish our own evidence-based guidelines.
根据现行实践指南,调查华东地区一家医院队列中炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的护理质量。
进行回顾性研究,纳入2000年6月至2006年6月期间在浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院住院的177例IBD患者。分析患者的人口统计学和临床特征数据,以及包括入院时和门诊就诊时口服氨基水杨酸制剂、局部治疗、皮质类固醇药物、免疫调节剂(如硫唑嘌呤)在内的药物治疗情况。
本研究共评估了177例符合条件的患者,其中包括71例克罗恩病(CD)患者和106例溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者。所有患者均为汉族,基线时疾病处于活动期。106例溃疡性结肠炎患者均接受了最佳剂量的氨基水杨酸治疗,而68例回肠或结肠CD患者中有27例(39.7%)接受了次优剂量的氨基水杨酸治疗。仅累及小肠的CD患者中,氨基水杨酸剂量不足的发生率显著更高(52.8%对25.0%,P=0.019)。31例(54.4%)活动期远端或左侧溃疡性结肠炎患者接受了局部治疗,27.8%的重症炎症性肠病患者未接受口服或静脉类固醇治疗。在51例有硫嘌呤使用指征的患者中,只有10例(19.6%)接受了免疫调节剂治疗,8例患者中有一半以上接受了次优剂量的硫唑嘌呤,且未尝试增加剂量。
IBD患者的护理质量有待进一步提高。CD患者尤其是仅累及小肠的患者在治疗中使用了次优剂量的氨基水杨酸。远端或左侧结肠炎患者对美沙拉嗪局部治疗的使用不足。部分重症IBD患者未使用口服或静脉类固醇治疗。免疫调节药物的使用有限。需要开展更大规模的前瞻性研究来调查IBD患者的护理质量,以建立我们自己的循证指南。