Fenici R R, Melillo G, Masselli M
Clinical Physiology-Cardiovascular Biomagnetism Unit C.N.R., Catholic University of S. Heart, Rome, Italy.
Int J Card Imaging. 1991;7(3-4):151-67. doi: 10.1007/BF01797748.
Since the introduction, in 1982, of a Biomagnetic facility in the clinical environment, efforts were concentrated to investigate whether magnetocardiography could really provide new information of potential diagnostic use, even avoiding electromagnetic shielding to facilitate simultaneous biomagnetic and conventional cardiac investigations, including cardiac catheterization for invasive electrophysiological procedures. More than 350 patients have been magnetically investigated using a single-channel second-order gradiometer. Results of 281 MCG studies, whose data have been extensively analyzed with updated software programs, are reported. Magnetocardiographic (MCG) mapping during endocardial pacing was performed to quantify the accuracy of MCG localization of intracardiac dipolar sources. MCG classification of ventricular preexcitation has been attempted in 70 patients with overt preexcitation. MCG localization of the ventricular preexcited area was accurate and reproducible, provided that during mapping a sufficient degree of ventricular preexcitation was present. MCG mapping during orthodromic A-V re-entry tachycardia has been also employed to attempt the localization of retrograde atrial preexcitation as well as the site of origin of atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For validation, the results of catheter and epicardial mappings have been used. Other applications of clinical magnetocardiography are under evaluation. The use of the Relative smoothness index needs, in our opinion, a larger experience to define its reliability as a predictor of risk for sudden death. MCG follow-up study of patients with transplanted hearts seems to be a promising application, for early detection of acute graft rejection reaction. Our reported case strongly supports this potentiality. Present work is also addressed to develop an integrated system allowing easy MCG mapping during cardiac catheterization, as a new method to guide diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as close as possible to the arrhythmogenic substrate.
自1982年临床环境中引入生物磁学设备以来,人们致力于研究磁心动图是否真的能提供具有潜在诊断价值的新信息,甚至在不进行电磁屏蔽的情况下,以便同时进行生物磁学和传统心脏检查,包括用于侵入性电生理程序的心脏导管插入术。已使用单通道二阶梯度仪对350多名患者进行了磁学检查。报告了281项磁心动图(MCG)研究的结果,其数据已使用更新的软件程序进行了广泛分析。在心脏内膜起搏期间进行磁心动图映射,以量化心脏内偶极源的MCG定位准确性。已尝试对70例显性预激患者进行心室预激的MCG分类。只要在映射期间存在足够程度的心室预激,心室预激区域的MCG定位就是准确且可重复的。在顺向房室折返性心动过速期间的MCG映射也已用于尝试定位逆行心房预激以及房性和室性快速性心律失常的起源部位。为了进行验证,已使用导管和心外膜映射的结果。临床磁心动图的其他应用正在评估中。我们认为,相对平滑度指数的使用需要更多经验来确定其作为猝死风险预测指标的可靠性。对心脏移植患者的MCG随访研究似乎是一个有前景的应用,可用于早期检测急性移植物排斥反应。我们报告的病例有力地支持了这种可能性。目前的工作还致力于开发一种集成系统,以便在心脏导管插入术期间轻松进行MCG映射,作为一种尽可能接近致心律失常基质来指导诊断和治疗程序的新方法。