Hombach V, Kochs M, Weismüller P, Clausen M, Henze E, Richter P, Höher M, Peper A, Eggeling T, Adam W E
Department of Cardiology/Angiology/Pneumonology, University of Ulm, Germany.
Int J Card Imaging. 1991;7(3-4):225-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01797755.
Since catheter or surgical techniques for ablating the arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with SVT due to accessory pathways or those with VT are now available, exact localization of the substrate is mandatory. We report preliminary results of two new non-invasive techniques for localizing either the site of earliest ventricular contraction using ISPECT, or the site of initial ventricular depolarization by magnetocardiography (MCG) in WPW syndrome and in VT patients. Thirteen patients with WPW syndrome and 8 patients with sustained VTs were studied with ISPECT. In 9/13, comparative catheter mapping data were available. Two patients had two Kent bundles. 13/15 Kent bundles could be localized by ISPECT. In 5/9 patients the area of Kent bundle insertion was identical with ISPECT and catheter mapping, in 3 correlation was fair, and in 2 patients with 2 Kent bundles ISPECT failed to localize their insertion. In 3/8 patients with VT catheter mapping could not be performed for hemodynamic reasons. In 2/5 patients the area of VT focus was identical with both methods, in one patient it was adjacent to each other, and in 2/5 patients a larger anatomic distance of the focus was found with both methods. In 3/7 patients with WPW the MCG showed the site of Kent bundle insertion, which was identical to that seen by catheter mapping. In one patient the area was adjacent, and in 3 more distant from the site determined by catheter mapping. In 1/2 patients with 2 Kent bundles, one of these could be detected by MCG. In 1/3 patients with VT, the site of VT focus was identical with both methods, but in the remaining two a distance of 3-4 cm was observed between the area seen with MCG and that with catheter mapping. In 4 further VT patients with stable and uniform ventricular late potentials, ventricular late magnetic activity was found with different QRS lengths within the single MCG channels. From our results we conclude that both ISPECT and MCG seem to become very promising non-invasive techniques for localizing ectopic ventricular depolarization in WPW syndrome and VT patients. However, these methods have to be refined, improved and validated by further systematical studies.
由于现在已有用于消融因旁路导致的室上性心动过速(SVT)患者或室性心动过速(VT)患者致心律失常基质的导管或外科技术,因此必须准确对基质进行定位。我们报告了两种新的非侵入性技术的初步结果,这两种技术分别用于使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(ISPECT)定位最早心室收缩的部位,或通过心磁图(MCG)定位预激综合征(WPW)和VT患者初始心室去极化的部位。对13例WPW综合征患者和8例持续性VT患者进行了ISPECT研究。13例中有9例可获得导管标测的对比数据。2例患者有两条肯特束。15条肯特束中有13条可通过ISPECT定位。9例患者中有5例肯特束插入区域通过ISPECT和导管标测是相同的,3例相关性尚可,2例有两条肯特束的患者,ISPECT未能定位其插入部位。8例VT患者中有3例因血流动力学原因无法进行导管标测。5例患者中有2例VT起源部位通过两种方法显示相同,1例患者两者相邻,5例患者中有2例通过两种方法发现起源部位的解剖距离更大。7例WPW患者中有3例MCG显示了肯特束插入部位,与导管标测所见相同。1例患者该区域相邻,另外3例距离导管标测确定的部位更远。2例有两条肯特束的患者中有1例,其中一条可通过MCG检测到。3例VT患者中有1例,VT起源部位通过两种方法显示相同,但其余2例患者MCG所见区域与导管标测所见区域之间观察到有3 - 4厘米的距离。另外4例有稳定且一致的心室晚电位的VT患者,在单个MCG通道内发现不同QRS波长度下的心室晚期磁活动。从我们的结果得出结论,ISPECT和MCG似乎都成为用于定位WPW综合征和VT患者异位心室去极化的非常有前景的非侵入性技术。然而,这些方法必须通过进一步的系统研究进行完善、改进和验证。