Burzykowski Tomasz, Buyse Marc, Yothers Greg, Sakamoto Junichi, Sargent Dan
Center for Statistics, Hasselt University, Agoralaan D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Mar;14(1):54-64. doi: 10.1007/s10985-007-9079-4. Epub 2008 Jan 20.
Sargent et al (J Clin Oncol 23: 8664-8670, 2005) concluded that 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) can be considered a valid surrogate (replacement) endpoint for 5-year overall survival (OS) in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. We address the question whether the conclusion holds for trials involving other classes of treatments than those considered by Sargent et al. Additionally, we assess if the 3-year cutpoint is an optimal one. To this aim, we investigate whether the results reported by Sargent et al. could have been used to predict treatment effects in three centrally randomized adjuvant colorectal cancer trials performed by the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment for Cancer (JFMTC) (Sakamoto et al. J Clin Oncol 22:484-492, 2004). Our analysis supports the conclusion of Sargent et al. and shows that using DFS at 2 or 3 years would be the best option for the prediction of OS at 5 years.
萨金特等人(《临床肿瘤学杂志》2005年第23卷:8664 - 8670页)得出结论,在结直肠癌辅助化疗的临床试验中,3年无病生存期(DFS)可被视为5年总生存期(OS)的有效替代终点。我们探讨了该结论是否适用于涉及萨金特等人所考虑治疗类别之外的其他治疗类别的试验。此外,我们评估3年这个时间节点是否为最佳节点。为此,我们研究了萨金特等人报告的结果是否可用于预测日本癌症多学科治疗基金会(JFMTC)进行的三项中心随机化结直肠癌辅助试验(坂本等人,《临床肿瘤学杂志》2004年第22卷:484 - 492页)中的治疗效果。我们的分析支持了萨金特等人的结论,并表明使用2年或3年的DFS来预测5年的OS是最佳选择。