Heim Dominik, Passweg Jakob, Gregor Michael, Buser Andreas, Theocharides Alexander, Arber Caroline, Meyer-Monard Sandrine, Halter Jörg, Tichelli Andre, Gratwohl Alois
Hematology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Transfusion. 2008 Apr;48(4):681-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01613.x. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
Providing patients with platelet (PLT) transfusions requires important logistic resources and represents a considerable cost factor. Optimizing PLT transfusions is in the interest of not only patient safety but also economic importance. Only few studies have evaluated factors associated with transfusion results.
In a prospective single-center study, 9923 mainly prophylactic PLT transfusions given to 672 patients treated for hematologic malignancies between 1997 and 2004 were investigated. Patient and product factors were analyzed. Transfusion efficacy was measured by the corrected count increment (CCI), and side effects were recorded.
The mean CCI of all transfusions was 14.05 (standard deviation, 9.5). The CCI correlates with the transfusion interval. PLT transfusions that resulted in a transfusion interval of 1 day or less had significantly lower CCI of 11.3 than transfusions that resulted in a transfusion interval of 2 days or more (15.57). Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients had a significantly lower transfusion efficacy (CCI mean, 13.3) whereas patients treated with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) had better CCIs (17.2) compared to patients who were treated with chemotherapy only. Longer PLT storage time and ABO mismatch had a negative impact on transfusion efficacy. PLTs stored in PLT additive storage solution were less effective than PLTs stored in their own autologous plasma.
Manipulation of PLT products may result in lower transfusion efficacy as illustrated by the introduction of PLT additive storage solution in this report. The higher number of products used per patient may negatively impact on advantages gained by the transfusion of "safer" PLT products.
为患者提供血小板(PLT)输注需要大量后勤资源,且是一个相当大的成本因素。优化PLT输注不仅关乎患者安全,也具有经济重要性。仅有少数研究评估了与输注结果相关的因素。
在一项前瞻性单中心研究中,对1997年至2004年间给予672例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的9923次主要预防性PLT输注进行了调查。分析了患者和产品因素。通过校正计数增加值(CCI)来衡量输注疗效,并记录副作用。
所有输注的平均CCI为14.05(标准差为9.5)。CCI与输注间隔相关。导致输注间隔为1天或更短的PLT输注的CCI显著低于导致输注间隔为2天或更长的输注(分别为11.3和15.57)。异基因干细胞移植受者的输注疗效显著较低(平均CCI为13.3),而与仅接受化疗的患者相比,接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)治疗的患者CCI更好(17.2)。较长的PLT储存时间和ABO血型不匹配对输注疗效有负面影响。储存在PLT添加剂储存溶液中的PLT比储存在自身自体血浆中的PLT效果更差。
如本报告中引入PLT添加剂储存溶液所示,对PLT产品的处理可能导致较低的输注疗效。每位患者使用的产品数量增加可能会对输注“更安全”的PLT产品所获得的优势产生负面影响。