Ferrer C, Rodríguez A, Abad J L, Fernandez J, Alió J L
Department of Molecular Biology, VISSUM, Institute of Ophthalmology of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;92(5):678-82. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.124768. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal 1.5% levofloxacin versus combined treatment with vancomycin and ceftazidime in an experimental model of bacterial endophthalmitis.
The right eye of 75 New Zealand White rabbits was inoculated in the vitreous cavity with strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study evaluated treatment with 1.5% levofloxacin compared with 1% vancomycin plus 2.2% ceftazidime, and a control group. At 24 h after treatment, 100 microl vitreous and aqueous humor were harvested, and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per ml was determined. The microbiological status of the vitreous and aqueous humor samples was tested at day 2, 3, 5 and 8. The Peyman classification was used to assess the severity of endophthalmitis.
For the S. epidermidis endophthalmitis model, levofloxacin treatment produced an approximately 3 log decrease in CFU/ml of vitreous relative to that in untreated eyes (p = 0.023), whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced a 5 log reduction in CFU/ml (p = 0.023). However, in the S. aureus model, levofloxacin treatment produced an approximately 4 log reduction in CFU/ml, whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced an approximately 2 log reduction in CFU/ml relative to that of the control (p = 0.018 and p = 0.019, respectively). Treatment of P. aeruginosa-infected rabbit eyes with levofloxacin produced a 5 log reduction in CFU/ml of vitreous, whereas vancomycin plus ceftazidime produced an approximately 3-4 log reduction in CFU/ml relative to that of the control (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between levofloxacin and vancomycin plus ceftazidime on comparing the reduction of CFU/ml of vitreous for any of the bacterial strains studied.
Levofloxacin appears to be effective in treating experimental endophthalmitis in the rabbit model. Further studies, especially on the toxicity of intravitreal levofloxacin, are required before a clinical role for the drug in postoperative therapy can be determined.
在细菌性眼内炎实验模型中,评估玻璃体内注射1.5%左氧氟沙星与万古霉素联合头孢他啶治疗的疗效。
将表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌或铜绿假单胞菌菌株接种于75只新西兰白兔的右眼玻璃体内。该研究评估了1.5%左氧氟沙星与1%万古霉素加2.2%头孢他啶治疗的效果,并设置了一个对照组。治疗24小时后,采集100微升玻璃体和房水,测定每毫升的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量。在第2、3、5和8天对玻璃体和房水样本进行微生物学检测。采用佩曼分类法评估眼内炎的严重程度。
在表皮葡萄球菌性眼内炎模型中,与未治疗的眼睛相比,左氧氟沙星治疗使玻璃体中的CFU/ml下降了约3个对数(p = 0.023),而万古霉素加头孢他啶使CFU/ml下降了5个对数(p = 0.023)。然而,在金黄色葡萄球菌模型中,左氧氟沙星治疗使CFU/ml下降了约4个对数,而万古霉素加头孢他啶相对于对照组使CFU/ml下降了约2个对数(分别为p = 0.018和p = 0.019)。用左氧氟沙星治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染的兔眼,使玻璃体中的CFU/ml下降了5个对数,而万古霉素加头孢他啶相对于对照组使CFU/ml下降了约3 - 4个对数(p = 0.001)。然而,在比较任何研究的细菌菌株玻璃体中CFU/ml的下降情况时,左氧氟沙星与万古霉素加头孢他啶之间没有显著差异。
左氧氟沙星似乎对兔模型中的实验性眼内炎有效。在确定该药物在术后治疗中的临床作用之前,还需要进一步研究,尤其是关于玻璃体内注射左氧氟沙星的毒性研究。