Suppr超能文献

恶性肿瘤标志物在甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查中的应用:赫克托·巴蒂福拉间皮抗原-1、甲状腺过氧化物酶和二肽基肽酶IV的比较

Utility of malignancy markers in fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: comparison of Hector Battifora mesothelial antigen-1, thyroid peroxidase and dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV.

作者信息

de Micco C, Savchenko V, Giorgi R, Sebag F, Henry J-F

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologique, Faculté de Médecine, Bd Pierre Dramard, 13916 Marseille Cedex 20, France.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2008 Feb 26;98(4):818-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604194. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic interest of Hector Battifora mesothelial antigen-1 (HBME-1), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), and dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV (DPP4) in thyroid fine-needle aspirates obtained from 200 resected thyroid lesions (55 colloid nodules, 54 follicular adenomas, 59 papillary cancers, and 32 follicular carcinomas). Hector Battifora mesothelial antigen-1 or TPO expression (% positive cells) and DPP4 staining score (12-point scale) were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and optimal cutoff values for diagnosing malignancy were determined. The TPO ROC curve was consistently higher than the HBME-1 ROC curve. The TPO curve was also higher than the DPP4 curve with regard to sensitivity, but dipped below the DPP4 curve with regard to specificity. Using a cutoff value of <80% positive cells for TPO, >10% positive cells for HBME-1, and staining score > or =1 for DPP4, sensitivity to specificity ratios were 98-83% for TPO, 90-60% for HBME-1, and 88-80% for DPP4. Two particularly interesting findings of this study were the low negative likelihood ratio of TPO (0.02) allowing highly reliable exclusion of malignancy and the 100% specificity of DPP4 staining scores=12. Due to poor performance on follicular lesions, HBME-1 showed no advantage over TPO or DPP4.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较赫克托·巴蒂福拉间皮抗原-1(HBME-1)、甲状腺过氧化物酶(TPO)和二肽基肽酶IV(DPP4)在200例切除的甲状腺病变(55例胶样结节、54例滤泡性腺瘤、59例乳头状癌和32例滤泡状癌)的甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸物中的诊断价值。评估赫克托·巴蒂福拉间皮抗原-1或TPO表达(阳性细胞百分比)和DPP4染色评分(12分制)。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线并确定诊断恶性肿瘤的最佳临界值。TPO的ROC曲线始终高于HBME-1的ROC曲线。在敏感性方面,TPO曲线也高于DPP4曲线,但在特异性方面低于DPP4曲线。使用TPO阳性细胞<80%、HBME-1阳性细胞>10%和DPP4染色评分>或 =1的临界值,TPO的敏感性与特异性之比为98-83%,HBME-1为90-60%,DPP4为88-80%。本研究的两个特别有趣的发现是TPO的低阴性似然比(0.02)允许高度可靠地排除恶性肿瘤以及DPP4染色评分为12时的100%特异性。由于在滤泡性病变中表现不佳,HBME-1没有显示出比TPO或DPP4更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f2/2259194/a322c9376df6/6604194f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验