Henry C J, Fishbein L, Meggs W J, Ashford N A, Schulte P A, Anderson H, Osborne J S, Sepkovic D W
ILSI Risk Science Institute, Washington, DC 20036.
Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Nov;95:135-43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9195135.
Critical to a more definitive human health assessment of the potential health risks from exposure to complex mixtures in indoor air is the need for a more definitive clinical measure and etiology of the health effects of complex mixtures. This panel overview highlights six of the eight presentations of the conference panel discussion and features a number of the major topical areas of indoor air concern. W. G. Meggs assessed clinical research priorities with primary focus on the role of volatile organic chemicals in human health, recognizing the areas where definitive data are lacking. By recognizing many types of chemical sensitivity, it may be possible to design studies that can illuminate the mechanisms by which chemical exposure may cause disease. The critically important topic of multiple chemical sensitivity was discussed by N. A. Ashford, who identified four high risk groups and defined the demographics of these groups. P. A. Schulte addressed the issue of biological markers of susceptibility with specific considerations of both methodological and societal aspects that may be operative in the ability to detect innate or inborne differences between individuals and populations. Three case studies were reviewed. H. Anderson discussed the past and present priorities from a public health perspective, focusing on those issues dealing with exposures to environmental tobacco smoke and formaldehyde off-gassing from materials used in mobile home construction. J. J. Osborne described several case studies involving wood smoke exposure to children, with emphasis on the significantly greater occurrence of chronic respiratory symptoms and acute chest illness for children from homes heated with woodburning stoves.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对于更明确地评估室内空气中复杂混合物暴露对人类健康的潜在风险而言,关键在于需要一种更明确的临床测量方法以及对复杂混合物健康影响的病因学研究。本专题概述突出了会议专题讨论的八场报告中的六场,并介绍了一些室内空气相关的主要热门领域。W. G. 梅格斯评估了临床研究重点,主要关注挥发性有机化学物质在人类健康中的作用,同时认识到缺乏确凿数据的领域。通过认识到多种类型的化学敏感性,或许有可能设计出能够阐明化学物质暴露可能导致疾病的机制的研究。N. A. 阿什福德讨论了多重化学敏感性这一至关重要的话题,他确定了四个高风险群体并界定了这些群体的人口统计学特征。P. A. 舒尔特探讨了易感性生物标志物问题,特别考虑了在检测个体和人群之间先天或内在差异的能力方面可能起作用的方法学和社会层面因素。回顾了三个案例研究。H. 安德森从公共卫生角度讨论了过去和当前的重点,着重关注那些与接触环境烟草烟雾以及移动房屋建造中使用的材料释放甲醛有关的问题。J. J. 奥斯本描述了几个涉及儿童接触木烟的案例研究,强调使用燃木炉灶取暖的家庭中的儿童出现慢性呼吸道症状和急性胸部疾病的几率显著更高。(摘要截选于250词)