• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制医疗事故保险提高了医疗事故索赔率和诉讼的盈利能力,减少了计划在家分娩的数量。

Mandatory malpractice insurance Increases CS rate & profitability of litigation, decreases planned homebirths.

作者信息

Cohain Judy Slome

出版信息

Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2007 Winter(84):16-7.

PMID:18214260
Abstract

Making malpractice insurance mandatory by law for homebirth midwives serves two purposes: to make lawsuits more profitable and to decrease the number of homebirth midwives. Malpractice insurance has encouraged and increased number of lawsuits, which increases maternal morbidity and mortality rates by promoting the practice of "defensive medicine" on healthy women experiencing normal pregnancies. No evidence shows that mandatory malpractice insurance has any effect on improvement birth outcomes or public health.

摘要

通过法律强制要求家庭分娩助产士购买医疗事故保险有两个目的

使诉讼更有利可图,并减少家庭分娩助产士的数量。医疗事故保险鼓励并增加了诉讼数量,通过在正常怀孕的健康女性中推行“防御性医疗”做法,这增加了孕产妇发病率和死亡率。没有证据表明强制医疗事故保险对改善分娩结果或公共卫生有任何影响。

相似文献

1
Mandatory malpractice insurance Increases CS rate & profitability of litigation, decreases planned homebirths.强制医疗事故保险提高了医疗事故索赔率和诉讼的盈利能力,减少了计划在家分娩的数量。
Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2007 Winter(84):16-7.
2
Malpractice liability burden in midwifery: a survey of Michigan certified nurse-midwives.助产工作中的医疗事故责任负担:对密歇根州认证助产护士的一项调查。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;53(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.10.003.
3
Forces promoting health insurance coverage of homebirth: a case study in Washington State.
Women Health. 2002;36(3):13-30. doi: 10.1300/J013v36n03_02.
4
Perspectives on private practice. Professional malpractice insurance and practicing within professional guidelines.私人执业的观点。专业医疗事故保险及在专业准则范围内执业。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2006 Aug;42(3):201-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2006.00072.x.
5
Closed Claims Analysis of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Midwives: Lessons Learned Regarding Safe Practices and the Avoidance of Litigation.涉及助产士的医疗事故诉讼结案索赔分析:关于安全操作及避免诉讼的经验教训
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):437-44. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12310.
6
Keeping midwives out of court.让助产士远离法庭。
Pract Midwife. 2010 Mar;13(3):36-7.
7
Litigation and legislation. Punitive damages in malpractice lawsuits.诉讼与立法。医疗事故诉讼中的惩罚性损害赔偿。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4):569-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.006.
8
Issues in liability insurance and the nursing consultant.
Clin Nurse Spec. 1989 Spring;3(1):42-5.
9
The role of litigation in midwifery practice in the United States: results from a nationwide survey of certified nurse-midwives/certified midwives.诉讼在美国助产实践中的作用:对注册护士助产士/注册助产士的全国性调查结果
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;52(5):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.013.
10
Why planned attended homebirth should be more widely supported in Australia.为何在澳大利亚应更广泛地支持计划性在家分娩。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;48(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00916.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trend Prediction for Cesarean Deliveries Based on Robson Classification System at a Tertiary Referral Unit of North India.基于罗布森分类系统对印度北部一家三级转诊医院剖宫产分娩情况的趋势预测
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Apr;70(2):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01275-7. Epub 2019 Oct 11.