• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trend Prediction for Cesarean Deliveries Based on Robson Classification System at a Tertiary Referral Unit of North India.基于罗布森分类系统对印度北部一家三级转诊医院剖宫产分娩情况的趋势预测
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Apr;70(2):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01275-7. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
2
Study of Caesarean Section Births in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mumbai Using Robson Classification System.使用罗布森分类系统对孟买一家三级护理医院剖宫产分娩情况的研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01851-y. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
3
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
4
Cesarean delivery in Iran: a population-based analysis using the Robson classification system.伊朗的剖宫产术:基于人群的应用 Robson 分类系统分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04517-1.
5
The Rates of Cesarean Section Deliveries According to Robson Classification System During the Year of 2018 Among Patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.2018年沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王医疗城患者中剖宫产分娩率按罗布森分类系统统计情况
Cureus. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):e11529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11529.
6
Cesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar: A Retrospective Study.在比哈尔邦一家三级医疗中心使用罗布森分类法进行剖宫产审计:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 13;14(3):e23133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23133. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.临床审计对西班牙一家医院剖宫产率的影响:根据罗布森分类法对6年数据的分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification.对土耳其按罗伯逊分类法分析的高剖宫产率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(16):2682-2692. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.立陶宛采用罗布森十组分类系统的剖宫产率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2015 Nov;51(5):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System.根据罗伯逊十组分类系统对葡萄牙一家三级医院剖宫产率的分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;42(6):310-315. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712127. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis and trends of caesarean sections using Robson's classification over 7-year period at a rural teaching hospital.一家农村教学医院7年间使用罗布森分类法对剖宫产情况的分析与趋势
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5550-5554. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_516_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.在一家西班牙三级医院应用改良的十组罗布森分类法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):252. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010252.
3
Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial.世界卫生组织分娩护理指南对某三级医疗中心降低剖宫产率的影响:一项开放标签随机对照试验
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Jul 20;2(3):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100075. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Cesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar: A Retrospective Study.在比哈尔邦一家三级医疗中心使用罗布森分类法进行剖宫产审计:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 13;14(3):e23133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23133. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
High Time for Routine Implementation of the Robson Ten-Group Classification for Cesarean Sections Reporting in India!!!印度是时候常规实施剖宫产报告的罗布森十组分类法了!!!
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Feb;71(1):101-102. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01382-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术和私人保险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016600.
2
[Trend of caesarean section rate and puerpera characteristics: based on Robson classification].剖宫产率及产妇特征趋势:基于罗布森分类法
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 10;38(7):963-967. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.07.023.
3
Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.使用罗布森分类系统报告魁北克的剖宫产情况。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Mar;39(3):152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.010.
4
The Ten-Group Robson Classification: A Single Centre Approach Identifying Strategies to Optimise Caesarean Section Rates.十组罗布森分类法:一种确定优化剖宫产率策略的单中心方法
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017;2017:5648938. doi: 10.1155/2017/5648938. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Audit of Caesarean Section Births in Small Private Maternity Homes: Analysis of 15-Year Data Applying the Modified Robson Criteria, Canada.加拿大小型私立妇产医院剖宫产分娩情况审计:应用改良罗布森标准对15年数据的分析
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):289-94. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0894-y. Epub 2016 May 9.
6
Violence against doctors on the increase in India.印度针对医生的暴力行为呈上升趋势。
Natl Med J India. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):214-5.
7
Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?稳定剖宫产率:针对哪些目标人群?
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):690-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13199. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
8
Births: final data for 2011.出生情况:2011年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Jun 28;62(1):1-69, 72.
9
A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.剖宫产罗布森分类法的系统评价:哪些有效、哪些无效以及如何改进。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. eCollection 2014.
10
Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.产科保健共识 1:安全预防初次剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d.

基于罗布森分类系统对印度北部一家三级转诊医院剖宫产分娩情况的趋势预测

Trend Prediction for Cesarean Deliveries Based on Robson Classification System at a Tertiary Referral Unit of North India.

作者信息

Mittal Pratima, Pandey Divya, Suri Jyotsna, Bharti Rekha

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029 India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Apr;70(2):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01275-7. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-019-01275-7
PMID:32255948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7109230/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

World Health Organization proposed use of Robson Classification as a global standard for assessing, maintaining and comparing Cesarean section (CS) rates. This paper aimed to examine CS trend at a tertiary center according to Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) over three-year period (2015-2017) and to predict future Cesarean trends.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary teaching institute and included 81,784 females who delivered at this hospital over three-year duration (2015-2017). The data compilation was done according to Robson TGCS. The main outcome measures were overall annual CS rates, Robson group-wise CS rates, future overall and Robson group-wise CS trend. These parameters were calculated, trend analysis was done and trend over future 3 years was predicted.

RESULTS

There were 81,784 deliveries (62,336 vaginal and 19,448 Cesarean deliveries) over the study period. The year-wise CS rate was 22.4%, 23.5% and 25.5%, respectively. The largest contribution was by group 5 followed by group 2 and group 1. Based on 3-year data, it was predicted that CS rate will increase by 0.905% annually over coming 3 years. In groups 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, predicted trend value showed an annual increase by 0.65%, 0.05%, 0.05%, 0.05% and 0.10%, respectively; in groups 1, 2, 5, 9 and 10, it showed an annual decrease of 0.45%, 0.05%, 1.50%, 0.50% and 0.05%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing CS rate trend was seen over last 3 years with a predicted rise of 0.905% per year. Robson groups 5, 2 and 1 were at present major contributors; however, the trend analysis predicted a decreasing trend. Trend analysis predicted annual increment in groups 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 over next 3 years, thereby suggesting need to focus on these groups as well.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织提议将罗布森分类法作为评估、维持和比较剖宫产(CS)率的全球标准。本文旨在根据罗布森十组分类系统(TGCS)研究某三级医疗中心三年期间(2015 - 2017年)的剖宫产趋势,并预测未来的剖宫产趋势。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级教学机构进行,纳入了在该医院三年期间(2015 - 2017年)分娩的81784名女性。数据收集按照罗布森TGCS进行。主要观察指标为总体年度剖宫产率、按罗布森分组的剖宫产率、未来总体及按罗布森分组的剖宫产趋势。计算这些参数,进行趋势分析并预测未来3年的趋势。

结果

研究期间共有81784例分娩(62336例阴道分娩和19448例剖宫产)。逐年的剖宫产率分别为22.4%、23.5%和25.5%。贡献最大的是第5组,其次是第2组和第1组。根据三年数据预测,未来三年剖宫产率将每年增加0.905%。在第3、4、6、7和8组中,预测趋势值显示每年分别增加0.65%、0.05%、0.05%、0.05%和0.10%;在第1、2、5、9和10组中,显示每年分别下降0.45%、0.05%、1.50%、0.50%和0.05%。

结论

过去三年剖宫产率呈上升趋势,预计每年上升0.905%。目前罗布森第5、2和1组是主要贡献者;然而,趋势分析预测呈下降趋势。趋势分析预测未来三年第3、4、6、7和8组将逐年增加,因此也表明需要关注这些组。