• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗对医院价格的影响正在减弱吗?

Is the impact of managed care on hospital prices decreasing?

作者信息

Dranove David, Lindrooth Richard, White William D, Zwanziger Jack

机构信息

Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-2013, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):362-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.004
PMID:18215433
Abstract

Prior studies find that the growth of managed care through the early 1990s introduced a strong positive relationship between price and concentration in hospital markets. We hypothesize that the relaxation of constraints on consumer choice in response to a "managed care backlash" has diminished the price sensitivity of demand facing hospitals, reducing or possibly reversing the price-concentration relationship. We test this hypothesis by studying the price/concentration relationship for hospitals in California and Florida for selected years between 1990 and 2003, while addressing the potential endogeneity of concentration. We find an increasingly positive price/concentration in the 1990s with a peak occurring by 2001. Between 2001 and 2003, the growth in this relationship halts and possibly reverses.

摘要

先前的研究发现,到20世纪90年代初,管理式医疗的发展在医院市场中引入了价格与集中度之间的强正相关关系。我们假设,作为对“管理式医疗反弹”的回应,消费者选择限制的放松降低了医院面临的需求的价格敏感性,从而减弱或可能扭转了价格与集中度的关系。我们通过研究1990年至2003年期间选定年份加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州医院的价格/集中度关系来检验这一假设,同时处理集中度的潜在内生性问题。我们发现,20世纪90年代价格/集中度关系日益正向,到2001年达到峰值。在2001年至2003年期间,这种关系的增长停止,甚至可能发生逆转。

相似文献

1
Is the impact of managed care on hospital prices decreasing?管理式医疗对医院价格的影响正在减弱吗?
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):362-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
2
The effects of multi-hospital systems on hospital prices.多医院系统对医院价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):400-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
3
The effect of physician-hospital affiliations on hospital prices in California.医生与医院的附属关系对加利福尼亚州医院价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jan;25(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
4
Merger monopolies.合并垄断
Mod Healthc. 1994 Dec 5;24(49):38-40, 42-6, 48.
5
The behavior of multihospital chains in increasingly competitive California hospital markets: pro- or anti-competitive?
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1992;13:165-90.
6
What happens when Medicare cuts hospital prices? Assessing the impact on inpatient discharges among the elderly.医疗保险降低医院收费时会发生什么?评估对老年人住院出院情况的影响。
Find Brief. 2013 Nov;16(6):1-3.
7
Managed care's price bargaining with hospitals.管理式医疗与医院的价格谈判。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):350-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
8
The effects of case mix on hospital costs and revenues in managed care environments.病例组合对管理式医疗环境中医院成本和收入的影响。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2005 Summer;28(1):96-134.
9
The health care cost-shifting debate: could both sides be right?医疗保健成本转移辩论:双方可能都正确吗?
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Fall;34(1):64-71.
10
Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions: evidence from three states.医院竞争、管理式医疗与疾病住院后的死亡率:来自三个州的证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Dec;63(6 Suppl):112S-140S. doi: 10.1177/1077558706293839.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of hospital competition on healthcare quality: evidence from China's healthcare reform.医院竞争对医疗质量的影响:来自中国医疗改革的证据
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1543884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1543884. eCollection 2025.
2
Hospital and Health Insurance Markets Concentration and Inpatient Hospital Transaction Prices in the U.S. Health Care Market.美国医疗保健市场的医院和健康保险市场集中化与住院医院交易价格。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1203-1226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12706. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
Competition in the Dutch hospital sector: an analysis of health care volume and cost.
荷兰医院部门的竞争:医疗服务量与成本分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;18(2):139-153. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0762-9. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
"Managed competition" for Ireland? The single versus multiple payer debate.爱尔兰的“管理式竞争”?单一支付者与多支付者之争。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 26;14:442. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-442.
5
Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study.阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩收费及支付价格的差异分析:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 15;4(1):e004017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004017.
6
Comparing patient outcomes across payer types: implications for using hospital discharge records to assess quality.比较不同付费类型患者的结局:利用医院出院记录评估质量的意义。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1720-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01285.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
7
Public health care providers and market competition: the case of Finnish occupational health services.公共医疗保健提供者和市场竞争:芬兰职业健康服务案例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):3-16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0217-7. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
8
Trends in hospital cost and revenue, 1994-2005: how are they related to HMO penetration, concentration, and for-profit ownership?1994-2005 年医院成本和收入趋势:它们与 HMO 渗透率、集中程度和营利性所有权有何关系?
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):42-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01047.x. Epub 2009 Oct 13.