• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗与医院的价格谈判。

Managed care's price bargaining with hospitals.

作者信息

Wu Vivian Y

机构信息

University of Southern California and RAND Corporation, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):350-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.001
PMID:19108922
Abstract

Research has shown that managed care (MC) slowed the rate of growth in health care spending in the 1990s, primarily via lower unit prices paid. However, the mechanism of MC's price bargaining has not been well studied. This article uses a unique panel dataset with actual hospital prices in Massachusetts between 1994 and 2000 to examine the sources of MC's bargaining power. I find two significant determinants of price discounts. First, plans with large memberships are able to extract volume discounts across hospitals. Second, health plans that are more successful at channeling patients can extract greater discounts. Patient channeling can add to the volume discount that plans negotiate.

摘要

研究表明,管理式医疗(MC)在20世纪90年代减缓了医疗保健支出的增长速度,主要是通过降低支付的单价。然而,MC的价格谈判机制尚未得到充分研究。本文使用一个独特的面板数据集,其中包含1994年至2000年马萨诸塞州医院的实际价格,以研究MC议价能力的来源。我发现了价格折扣的两个重要决定因素。首先,会员众多的计划能够在各医院获得批量折扣。其次,在引导患者方面更成功的健康计划能够获得更大的折扣。患者引导可以增加计划谈判获得的批量折扣。

相似文献

1
Managed care's price bargaining with hospitals.管理式医疗与医院的价格谈判。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):350-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
2
How does managed care do it?管理式医疗是如何做到的?
Rand J Econ. 2000 Fall;31(3):526-48.
3
Negotiation advantages of professional associations in health care.医疗保健领域专业协会的谈判优势。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005 Jun;5(2):191-204. doi: 10.1007/s10754-005-1867-3.
4
Is the impact of managed care on hospital prices decreasing?管理式医疗对医院价格的影响正在减弱吗?
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):362-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
5
Market structure and hospital-insurer bargaining in the Netherlands.荷兰的市场结构与医院-保险公司的谈判
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):589-603. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0273-z. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
6
Learning new lines. New 'playbook' advises hospitals how to win bigger reimbursement for medical procedures that use expensive advanced technology.
Mod Healthc. 2003 Jul 28;33(30):6-7, 1.
7
5 ways to improve managed care recovery.改善管理式医疗康复的五种方法。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2013 Feb;67(2):34.
8
Marketplace. What's behind the squeeze on hospitals: all payers are seeking bargains at once.
Med Health. 2000 Oct 2;54(38):suppl 1-2.
9
Hospital-insurer bargaining: an empirical investigation of appendectomy pricing.医院与保险公司的议价:阑尾切除术定价的实证研究
J Health Econ. 1997 Aug;16(4):417-34. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00536-x.
10
Getting along or going along? Health plan-provider contract showdowns subside.
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2004 Jan(74):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital system market share and commercial prices: a cross-sectional approach using price transparency data.医院系统市场份额与商业价格:一种使用价格透明度数据的横断面研究方法。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00580-w.
2
How is enrollees' trust in health insurers associated with choosing health insurance?被保险人对健康保险公司的信任如何与选择健康保险相关?
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0292964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292964. eCollection 2023.
3
The relation between trust and the willingness of enrollees to receive healthcare advice from their health insurer.
信任与参保人接受健康保险公司提供的医疗保健建议的意愿之间的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09016-9.
4
The effect on dental care utilization from transitioning pediatric Medicaid beneficiaries to managed care.将儿科医疗补助受益儿童过渡到管理式医疗对牙科保健利用率的影响。
Health Econ. 2022 Jun;31(6):1103-1128. doi: 10.1002/hec.4496. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Pricing in commercial dental insurance and provider markets.商业牙科保险和供应商市场的定价。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13544. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
An assessment of the Dutch experience with health insurers acting as healthcare advisors.评估荷兰健康保险公司充当医疗保健顾问的经验。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224829. eCollection 2019.
7
Consolidation in the dental industry: a closer look at dental payers and providers.牙科行业的整合:深入探讨牙科支付方和服务提供方。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020 Jun;20(2):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10754-019-09274-x. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
Patient responsiveness to a differential deductible: empirical results from The Netherlands.患者对差异免赔额的反应:来自荷兰的实证结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):513-524. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1014-y. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Knowledge Management Orientation: An Innovative Perspective to Hospital Management.知识管理导向:医院管理的创新视角
Iran J Public Health. 2017 Dec;46(12):1639-1645.
10
Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?利用免赔额进行患者分流:优先医疗机构的患者数量增加了吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0711-z. Epub 2015 Aug 1.