Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Iowa Univ., Iowa City, IA.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(1):151-61. doi: 10.1109/42.370412.
Visual estimation of coronary obstruction severity from angiograms suffers from poor inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and is often inaccurate. In spite of the widely recognized limitations of visual analysis, automated methods have not found widespread clinical use, in part because they too frequently fail to accurately identify vessel borders. The authors have developed a robust method for simultaneous detection of left and right coronary borders that is suitable for analysis of complex images with poor contrast, nearby or overlapping structures, or branching vessels. The reliability of the simultaneous border detection method and that of the authors' previously reported conventional border detection method were tested in 130 complex images, selected because conventional automated border detection might be expected to fail. Conventional analysis failed to yield acceptable borders in 65/130 or 50% of images. Simultaneous border detection was much more robust (p<.001) and failed in only 15/130 or 12% of complex images. Simultaneous border detection identified stenosis diameters that correlated significantly better with observer-derived stenosis diameters than did diameters obtained with conventional border detection (p<0.001), Simultaneous detection of left and right coronary borders is highly robust and has substantial promise for enhancing the utility of quantitative coronary angiography in the clinical setting.
从血管造影图像中目测冠状动脉阻塞的严重程度存在较差的观察者间和观察者内可重复性,并且通常不够准确。尽管人们普遍认识到视觉分析存在局限性,但自动化方法并未得到广泛的临床应用,部分原因是它们经常无法准确识别血管边界。作者开发了一种强大的同时检测左右冠状动脉边界的方法,适用于分析对比度差、附近有结构重叠或分支血管的复杂图像。在 130 张复杂图像中测试了同时边界检测方法和作者之前报告的传统边界检测方法的可靠性,这些图像是因为预期常规自动化边界检测可能会失败而选择的。在 65/130 或 50%的图像中,常规分析未能产生可接受的边界。同时边界检测则更加稳健(p<.001),在 15/130 或 12%的复杂图像中失败。同时边界检测识别的狭窄直径与观察者得出的狭窄直径相关性更好,优于常规边界检测获得的直径(p<0.001)。同时检测左右冠状动脉边界具有很高的稳健性,有望增强定量冠状动脉造影在临床环境中的实用性。