Div. of Nucl. Med., Emory Center for Positron Emission Tomography, Atlanta, GA.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15(2):197-205. doi: 10.1109/42.491421.
It has become commonplace to compare scanner sensitivity characteristics by comparing noise equivalent count rate curves. However, because a 20-cm diameter uniform phantom is drastically different from a human brain, these curves give misleading information when planning a neuro activation PET experiment. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) calculations have been performed using measured data (Siemens 921 scanner) from the three-dimensional (3-D) Hoffman brain phantom for the purpose of determining the optimal injection and scanning protocol for [ (15)O] labeled activation experiments. Region of interest (ROI) values along with the variance due to prompt (trues plus randoms) and random events were determined for various regions and radioactivity concentrations. Calculated attenuation correction was used throughout. Scatter correction was not used when calculating the SNR in activation studies because the number of scattered events is almost identical in each data acquisition and hence cancels. The authors results indicate that randoms correction should not be performed and that rather than being limited by the scanner capabilities, neuro activation experiments are limited by the amount of radioactivity that can be injected and the length of time the patient can stay in the scanner.
人们已经习惯通过比较噪声等效计数率曲线来比较扫描仪的灵敏度特性。然而,由于 20cm 直径的均匀体模与人类大脑有很大的不同,因此当计划神经激活 PET 实验时,这些曲线会提供误导性的信息。为了确定用于 [(15)O] 标记激活实验的最佳注射和扫描方案,使用来自三维(3-D)Hoffman 脑体模的测量数据(西门子 921 扫描仪)进行了信噪比(SNR)计算。对于不同的区域和放射性浓度,确定了与 ROI 值以及由于 prompt(真实事件加随机事件)和随机事件引起的方差有关的值。整个过程都使用了计算衰减校正。在激活研究中计算 SNR 时,未使用散射校正,因为在每次数据采集时,散射事件的数量几乎相同,因此会相互抵消。作者的结果表明,不应进行随机校正,并且神经激活实验不是受到扫描仪性能的限制,而是受到可以注射的放射性核素数量和患者在扫描仪中停留的时间长度的限制。