Will Bruno, Dalrymple-Alford John, Wolff Mathieu, Cassel Jean-Christophe
LINC, UMR 7191, Université Louis Pasteur-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IFR des Neurosciences 037, GDR 2905 CNRS, 12 rue Goethe, Strasbourg, France.
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Sep 1;192(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.11.030. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
Although rejected for the most part of the 20th Century, the idea of brain plasticity began to receive wide acceptance from the 1970s. Yet there has been relatively little theoretical comment on the definition and use of "plasticity" in the field of neurobiology. An early exception to this lack of critical reflection on neural plasticity was provided by Jacques Paillard in a seminal paper that he published in 1976 [Paillard J. Réflexions sur l'usage du concept de plasticité en neurobiology. J Psychol 1976;1:33-47]. As this valuable contribution was published in French, the present authors provide an English adaptation to help convey his ideas to an international audience, together with a contemporary commentary on this paper. Paillard's definition of the term "plasticity" is probably as pertinent today as it was 30 years ago, especially in terms of its relevance to multiple levels of analysis of brain function (molecular, cellular, systemic). Sadly, Jacques Paillard died in 2006; our comments therefore also include a brief biographical tribute to this outstanding neuroscientist.
尽管在20世纪的大部分时间里遭到摒弃,但大脑可塑性这一概念自20世纪70年代起开始被广泛接受。然而,在神经生物学领域,对于“可塑性”的定义和用法,相对而言理论性的评论较少。雅克·帕亚尔在1976年发表的一篇具有开创性的论文中 [帕亚尔 J. 关于神经生物学中可塑性概念用法的思考。《心理学杂志》1976年;第1期:33 - 47页],对神经可塑性缺乏批判性反思的情况做出了早期的例外。由于这一宝贵贡献是以法语发表的,本文作者提供了英文译本,以帮助将他的观点传达给国际读者,并对该论文进行当代评论。帕亚尔对“可塑性”一词的定义在今天可能与30年前一样贴切,特别是在其与大脑功能的多个分析层面(分子、细胞、系统)的相关性方面。遗憾的是,雅克·帕亚尔于2006年去世;因此我们的评论还包括对这位杰出神经科学家的简短生平致敬。