Brydges Ryan, Kurahashi Allison, Brümmer Vera, Satterthwaite Lisa, Classen Roger, Dubrowski Adam
Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.045. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
Proficiency-based residency training programs can be more efficient than the current duration-based formats. For their successful implementation, appropriate proficiency criteria must be developed. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between technical skill performances assessed using computer- and expert-based methods and training year. An assumption was that asymptotes in performance as a function of training year can be used to set the proficiency level for a technical skill, so the value at which the asymptote occurs can be labeled as the proficiency criteria.
Thirty-eight general surgery residents performed one-handed knot tying on bench-top simulators at two levels of difficulty: superficial and deep. Motion-efficiency measures and expert-based measures were used to evaluate performance. Total number of operations (ie, surgical volume) that each trainee participated in during residency was also acquired.
On the superficial model, asymptotes were observed at year 1 for motion-efficiency and year 3 for expert-based measures. On the deep model, asymptotes were observed at year 2 for motion-efficiency and year 4 for expert-based measures.
The data demonstrate the challenges associated with defining technical skills proficiency criteria. Different asymptotes were observed for the two assessment methods and neither covaried substantially with surgical volume. These data suggest that this asymptote approach in defining proficiency criteria can be suitable for development of proficiency-based residency training programs. The sensitivity of this approach to the type of assessment method and to the functional difficulty of the simulators used for assessment must be considered.
基于熟练程度的住院医师培训项目可能比当前基于时长的培训形式更有效。为了成功实施这些项目,必须制定适当的熟练程度标准。本研究的目的是调查使用基于计算机和专家的方法评估的技术技能表现与培训年份之间的关系。一个假设是,作为培训年份函数的表现渐近线可用于设定技术技能的熟练程度水平,因此渐近线出现时的值可标记为熟练程度标准。
38名普通外科住院医师在台式模拟器上进行单手打结操作,操作难度分为两个级别:浅表和深部。使用动作效率测量方法和基于专家的测量方法来评估操作表现。还获取了每位受训者在住院期间参与的手术总数(即手术量)。
在浅表模型上,动作效率在第1年观察到渐近线,基于专家的测量方法在第3年观察到渐近线。在深部模型上,动作效率在第2年观察到渐近线,基于专家的测量方法在第4年观察到渐近线。
数据表明了定义技术技能熟练程度标准所面临的挑战。两种评估方法观察到不同的渐近线,且两者均与手术量没有显著的共变关系。这些数据表明,这种定义熟练程度标准的渐近线方法可能适用于基于熟练程度的住院医师培训项目的开发。必须考虑这种方法对评估方法类型以及用于评估的模拟器功能难度的敏感性。