Kiviranta P, Lammentausta E, Töyräs J, Kiviranta I, Jurvelin J S
Department of Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Jul;16(7):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.10.016. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
Mechanical indentation and ultrasound (US) indentation instruments have been introduced for quantitative assessment of cartilage properties in vivo. In this study, we compared capabilities of these instruments to determine properties of healthy and spontaneously degenerated human patellar cartilage in situ and to diagnose the early stages of osteoarthritis (OA).
Six anatomical sites were localized from human patellae (N=14). By determining the force by which the tissue resists constant deformation (F(IND)), a mechanical indentation instrument was used to measure the compressive dynamic stiffness of cartilage. Further, the dynamic modulus (E(US)) and the US reflection coefficient of cartilage surface (R(US)) were measured with an US indentation instrument. For reference, Young's modulus and dynamic modulus were determined from cartilage disks using unconfined compression geometry. Proteoglycan and collagen contents of samples were analyzed microscopically. The samples were divided into three categories (healthy, early degeneration, and advanced degeneration) based on the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) OA-grading.
Parameters R(US), E(US) and F(IND) were significantly associated with the histological, compositional and mechanical properties of cartilage (|r|=0.28-0.72, n=73-75, P<0.05). Particularly, R(US) was able to discern degeneration of the samples with high sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.98). All parameters, except R(US,) showed statistically significant site-dependent variation in healthy cartilage.
US reflection measurement shows potential for diagnostics of early OA as no site-matched reference values are needed. In addition, the high linear correlations between indentation and reference measurements suggest that these arthroscopic indentation instruments can be used for quantitative evaluation of cartilage mechanical properties, e.g., after cartilage repair surgery.
机械压痕和超声(US)压痕仪器已被用于体内软骨特性的定量评估。在本研究中,我们比较了这些仪器在原位测定健康和自发退变的人髌软骨特性以及诊断骨关节炎(OA)早期阶段的能力。
从人髌骨(N = 14)中定位六个解剖部位。通过确定组织抵抗恒定变形的力(F(IND)),使用机械压痕仪器测量软骨的压缩动态刚度。此外,使用超声压痕仪器测量软骨的动态模量(E(US))和软骨表面的超声反射系数(R(US))。作为参考,使用无侧限压缩几何形状从软骨盘确定杨氏模量和动态模量。对样品的蛋白聚糖和胶原蛋白含量进行显微镜分析。根据国际骨关节炎研究学会(OARSI)的OA分级,将样品分为三类(健康、早期退变和晚期退变)。
参数R(US)、E(US)和F(IND)与软骨的组织学、成分和力学特性显著相关(|r| = 0.28 - 0.72,n = 73 - 75,P < 0.05)。特别是,R(US)能够以高灵敏度(0.77)和特异性(0.98)识别样品的退变。除R(US)外,所有参数在健康软骨中均显示出统计学上显著的部位依赖性变化。
超声反射测量显示出诊断早期OA的潜力,因为不需要部位匹配的参考值。此外,压痕测量与参考测量之间的高线性相关性表明,这些关节镜压痕仪器可用于软骨力学特性的定量评估,例如在软骨修复手术后。