Shores E A, Lammél A, Hullick C, Sheedy J, Flynn M, Levick W, Batchelor J
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;79(10):1100-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.132571. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
Assessment of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is predominantly done using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). While the GCS is universally accepted for assessment of severity of traumatic brain injury, it may not be appropriate to rely on the GCS alone when assessing patients with mTBI in prehospital settings and emergency departments.
To determine whether administering the Revised Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia (PTA) Scale (R-WPTAS) in addition to the GCS would increase diagnostic accuracy in the early identification of cognitive impairment in patients with mTBI.
Data were collected from 82 consecutive participants with mTBI who presented to the emergency department of a level 1 trauma centre in Australia. A matched sample of 88 control participants who attended the emergency department for reasons other than head trauma was also assessed. All patients were assessed using the GCS, R-WPTAS and a battery of neuropsychological tests.
Patients with mTBI scored poorly compared with control patients on all measures. The R-WPTAS showed greater concurrent validity with the neuropsychological measures than the GCS and significantly increased prediction of group membership of patients with mTBI with cognitive impairment.
The R-WPTAS significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with mTBI who may be in PTA. Administration takes less than 1 min, and since early identification of a patient's cognitive status facilitates management decisions, it is recommended for routine use whenever the GCS is used.
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者的评估主要使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)。虽然GCS被广泛用于评估创伤性脑损伤的严重程度,但在院前环境和急诊科评估mTBI患者时,仅依靠GCS可能并不合适。
确定除GCS外,使用修订的韦斯特米德创伤后遗忘量表(R-WPTAS)是否会提高早期识别mTBI患者认知障碍的诊断准确性。
收集了82名连续就诊于澳大利亚一家一级创伤中心急诊科的mTBI患者的数据。还评估了88名因非头部创伤原因就诊于急诊科的对照参与者的匹配样本。所有患者均使用GCS、R-WPTAS和一系列神经心理学测试进行评估。
在所有测量指标上,mTBI患者的得分均低于对照患者。与GCS相比,R-WPTAS与神经心理学测量指标的同时效度更高,并且显著提高了对有认知障碍的mTBI患者分组的预测能力。
R-WPTAS在识别可能处于创伤后遗忘状态的mTBI患者方面显著提高了诊断准确性。评估用时不到1分钟,而且由于早期识别患者的认知状态有助于做出管理决策,因此建议在使用GCS时常规使用该量表。