Suppr超能文献

瘦女性和肥胖女性每日能量消耗的差异:姿势分配的作用。

Differences in daily energy expenditure in lean and obese women: the role of posture allocation.

作者信息

Johannsen Darcy L, Welk Gregory J, Sharp Rick L, Flakoll Paul J

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Jan;16(1):34-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is considered a risk factor for weight gain and obesity; however, due to the greater fat-free mass (FFM) found in obesity, detecting an impairment in RMR is difficult. The purposes of this study were to determine the RMR in lean and obese women controlling for FFM and investigate activity energy expenditure (AEE) and daily activity patterns in the two groups.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Twenty healthy, non-smoking, pre-menopausal women (10 lean and 10 obese) participated in this 14-day observational study on free-living energy balance. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry; AEE and total energy expenditure (TEE) were calculated using doubly labeled water (DLW), and activity patterns were investigated using monitors. Body composition including FFM and fat mass (FM) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

RMR was similar in the obese vs. lean women (1601 +/- 109 vs. 1505 +/- 109 kcal/day, respectively, P = 0.12, adjusting for FFM and FM). Obese women sat 2.5 h more each day (12.7 +/- 3.2 h vs. 10.1 +/- 2.0 h, P < 0.05), stood 2 h less (2.7 +/- 1.0 h vs. 4.7 +/- 2.2 h, P = 0.02) and spent half as much time in activity than lean women (2.6 +/- 1.5 h vs. 5.4 +/- 1.9 h, P = 0.002).

DISCUSSION

RMR was not lower in the obese women; however, they were more sedentary and expended less energy in activity than the lean women. If the obese women adopted the activity patterns of the lean women, including a modification of posture allocation, an additional 300 kcal could be expended every day.

摘要

目的

低静息代谢率(RMR)被认为是体重增加和肥胖的一个风险因素;然而,由于肥胖者的去脂体重(FFM)较大,检测RMR受损较为困难。本研究的目的是确定在控制FFM的情况下瘦女性和肥胖女性的RMR,并调查两组的活动能量消耗(AEE)和日常活动模式。

方法和步骤

20名健康、不吸烟、绝经前女性(10名瘦女性和10名肥胖女性)参与了这项为期14天的关于自由生活能量平衡的观察性研究。通过间接测热法测量RMR;使用双标记水(DLW)计算AEE和总能量消耗(TEE),并使用监测器调查活动模式。通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量包括FFM和脂肪量(FM)在内的身体成分。

结果

肥胖女性与瘦女性的RMR相似(分别为1601±109与1505±109千卡/天,P = 0.12,校正FFM和FM后)。肥胖女性每天久坐时间多2.5小时(12.7±3.2小时对10.1±2.0小时,P < 0.05),站立时间少2小时(2.7±1.0小时对4.7±2.2小时,P = 0.02),且活动时间仅为瘦女性的一半(2.6±1.5小时对5.4±1.9小时,P = 0.002)。

讨论

肥胖女性的RMR并不低;然而,与瘦女性相比,她们久坐不动,活动消耗的能量更少。如果肥胖女性采用瘦女性的活动模式,包括改变姿势分配,每天可多消耗300千卡能量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验