Paris Adeline, Horvath Rémi, Basset Pierre, Thiery Stéphane, Couturier Pascal, Franco Alain, Bosson Jean-Luc
Clinical Research Center, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Feb;35(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.014.
Bedsore and ulcer care can often be painful and no standardized analgesic method exists today for pain relief during treatment in adults and the elderly. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture vs. morphine during painful bedsore and ulcer care in adult and elderly patients, we conducted a randomized, crossover, multicenter, prospective, open-label, pilot study. Thirty-four inpatients, aged 53-96 years (median 84 years), were recruited in Grenoble University Hospital, Annecy Hospital and Chambéry Hospital, France, from January to June 2001. Each of the 34 patients received morphine (M), nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture (E), or morphine+nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture (ME) during painful care in a crossover protocol. Treatments were changed every two days and the study duration was six days. Analgesia was evaluated before and after each care session using a behavioral scale to evaluate pain in noncommunicating adults (ECPA), a visual analog scale (VAS), a global hetero-evaluation scale (GHES), and the DOLOPLUS-2 scale. There was a significant overall difference (P<0.01) among the three treatments. On the ECPA, the average difference after and before care was +5.2+/-8.6 (M), -0.3+/-8 (E), and -0.6+/-7.4 (ME), respectively. There was a significant difference between M and E, and M and ME (each P<0.01). No difference was found between E and ME (P=0.97). There were similar significant differences in the GHES and DOLOPLUS-2 scales (all tests P<0.01). Post hoc comparisons showed a significant difference (P<0.01) between M and E, and between M and ME without any additional effect for M+E. No differences were found with regard to safety or tolerability. This pilot study demonstrates the superiority of nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture over morphine for analgesia. This experience suggests that this mixture has ease of use, rapid effect, and limited contraindications when used during painful bedsore and ulcer care in elderly patients. Furthermore, it is well accepted by these patients and by nursing staff.
压疮与溃疡护理常常很痛苦,目前在成人和老年人的治疗过程中,不存在用于缓解疼痛的标准化镇痛方法。为了评估一氧化二氮 - 氧气混合气体与吗啡在成人和老年患者疼痛性压疮与溃疡护理中的镇痛效果,我们进行了一项随机、交叉、多中心、前瞻性、开放标签的试点研究。2001年1月至6月,在法国格勒诺布尔大学医院、阿讷西医院和尚贝里医院招募了34名年龄在53 - 96岁(中位数84岁)的住院患者。34名患者中的每一位在疼痛护理期间按照交叉方案接受吗啡(M)、一氧化二氮 - 氧气混合气体(E)或吗啡 + 一氧化二氮 - 氧气混合气体(ME)治疗。每两天更换一次治疗,研究持续时间为6天。在每次护理前后,使用用于评估无沟通能力成人疼痛的行为量表(ECPA)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、整体异质性评估量表(GHES)和DOLOPLUS - 2量表评估镇痛效果。三种治疗之间存在显著的总体差异(P < 0.01)。在ECPA上,护理前后的平均差异分别为 +5.2±8.6(M)、 -0.3±8(E)和 -0.6±7.4(ME)。M与E之间以及M与ME之间存在显著差异(各P < 0.01)。E与ME之间未发现差异(P = 0.97)。在GHES和DOLOPLUS - 2量表上也存在类似的显著差异(所有检验P < 0.01)。事后比较显示M与E之间以及M与ME之间存在显著差异(P < 0.01),且M + E无任何额外效果。在安全性或耐受性方面未发现差异。这项试点研究证明了一氧化二氮 - 氧气混合气体在镇痛方面优于吗啡。这一经验表明,在老年患者疼痛性压疮与溃疡护理期间使用这种混合气体具有使用方便、起效迅速且禁忌证有限的特点。此外,它得到了这些患者和护理人员的良好接受。