Choi Jin-Young, Kim Myeong-Jin, Lee Jeong Min, Lee Jae Young, Kim Se Hyung, Kim Ki Whang, Han Joon Koo, Choi Byung Ihn
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-ku Shinchon-dong 134, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):78-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0670-6. Epub 2007 May 22.
The purpose was to retrospectively compare two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) including breath-hold single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and multislice half-Fourier RARE versus navigator-triggered 3D-RARE MRC in the evaluation of biliary malignancy. MRC findings were evaluated in 31 patients with malignant biliary obstruction, including biliary malignancy, gallbladder carcinoma, and ampullary cancer. Two observers independently reviewed the images to assess the overall image quality, artifacts, ductal conspicuity, extent of disease, diagnostic confidence of tumor extent, and origin of tumor. The results were compared with surgical and histopathologic findings. Studies obtained with 3D-MRC were of significantly higher technical quality than those obtained with 2D-MRC. However, the accuracy between two sequences for classification of tumor showed no statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the Az values of 2D- and 3D-MRC for overall tumor extent in bilateral second order branch, intrapancreatic common bile duct (CBD) involvement (Az = 0.889, 0.881 for 2D and Az = 0.903, 0.864 for 3D). Nor was there a significant difference between two sequences in the assessment of the origin of tumor. Although 3D-MRC has superior image quality over 2D-MRC, 3D-MRC showed no statistically significant difference in accuracy compared with 2D-MRC for evaluating the extent of disease in malignant biliary obstructions.
目的是回顾性比较二维(2D)磁共振胆管造影(MRC),包括屏气单次激发快速采集弛豫增强序列(RARE)和多层半傅里叶RARE序列与导航触发三维RARE MRC序列在评估胆管恶性肿瘤中的应用。对31例恶性胆管梗阻患者的MRC检查结果进行了评估,这些患者包括胆管恶性肿瘤、胆囊癌和壶腹癌。两名观察者独立审阅图像,以评估整体图像质量、伪影、胆管清晰度、病变范围、肿瘤范围的诊断置信度以及肿瘤起源。将结果与手术和组织病理学结果进行比较。三维MRC获得的研究在技术质量上显著高于二维MRC获得的研究。然而,两种序列在肿瘤分类的准确性上没有统计学差异。在双侧二级分支、胰内胆总管(CBD)受累的整体肿瘤范围方面,二维和三维MRC的Az值之间没有显著差异(二维分别为0.889、0.881,三维分别为0.903、0.864)。在肿瘤起源的评估中,两种序列之间也没有显著差异。尽管三维MRC比二维MRC具有更高的图像质量,但在评估恶性胆管梗阻疾病范围时,三维MRC与二维MRC相比在准确性上没有统计学显著差异。