Humes Larry E
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405-7002, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;18(7):590-603. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.6.
In this review of recent studies from our laboratory at Indiana University, it is argued that audibility is the primary contributor to the speech-understanding difficulties of older adults in unaided listening, but that other factors, especially cognitive factors, emerge when the role of audibility has been minimized. The advantages and disadvantages of three basic approaches used in our laboratory to minimize the role of audibility are examined. The first of these made use of clinical fits of personal amplification devices, but generally failed to make the aided speech stimuli sufficiently audible for the listeners. As a result, hearing loss remained the predominant predictor of performance. The second approach made use of raised and spectrally shaped stimuli with identical shaping applied for all listeners. The third approach used spectrally shaped speech that ensured audibility (at least 10 dB sensation level) of the stimuli up to at least 4000 Hz for each individual listener. With few exceptions, the importance of cognitive factors was revealed once the speech stimuli were made sufficiently audible.
在对印第安纳大学我们实验室近期研究的综述中,有人认为,在未助听聆听时,可听度是导致老年人言语理解困难的主要因素,但当可听度的作用被减到最小时,其他因素,尤其是认知因素就会显现出来。我们研究室采用的三种用于将可听度的作用减到最小的基本方法的优缺点得到了检验。第一种方法利用个人放大装置的临床适配,但通常未能使助听言语刺激对聆听者具有足够的可听度。结果,听力损失仍然是表现的主要预测因素。第二种方法利用了提高的和经过频谱塑形的刺激,且对所有聆听者应用相同的塑形。第三种方法使用频谱塑形言语,确保每个聆听者的刺激在高达至少4000赫兹时具有可听度(至少10分贝感觉级)。除了少数例外,一旦言语刺激具有足够的可听度,认知因素的重要性就显现出来了。