Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y
Department of Anaesthesiology, Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo Medical University, Koshigaya City, Saitama, Japan.
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):544-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
We studied whether laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were easier when using the Pentax-AWS (Tokyo, Japan), a new videolaryngoscope, than when applying the Macintosh laryngoscope, during manual in-line neck stabilization.
In 203 anaesthetized patients with manual in-line neck stabilization, we inserted the Pentax-AWS and a Macintosh laryngoscope, in turn, and recorded the view of the glottis and time taken to laryngoscopy. The success rate of tracheal intubation (within 120 s) and time to intubation were also recorded.
The view of the glottis was significantly better with the Pentax-AWS than with the Macintosh laryngoscope (P<0.001). For the Macintosh laryngoscope, the view was obscured in 22 of 203 patients (11%) (Grade 3 in 21 patients and Grade 4 in one patient), whereas for the Pentax-AWS, the glottis was always clearly seen (Grade 1). Time taken to see the glottis with the Pentax-AWS [mean (sd): 6.0 (3.1) s] was significantly shorter than with the Macintosh laryngoscope [11.0 (5.0) s] (95% CI for difference: 4-6 s). The success rate of tracheal intubation with the Pentax-AWS (all of 99 patients) was significantly higher than with the Macintosh laryngoscope (93 of 104 patients) (P=0.001). Time taken for intubation was similar between the Macintosh laryngoscope [51 (27) s] and the Pentax-AWS [54 (14) s] (95% CI for difference: -9 to 3 s).
In patients with stabilized neck, the Pentax-AWS provided a better view of the glottis and a higher success rate of tracheal intubation, compared with the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.
我们研究了在手动保持颈部直线稳定的情况下,使用新型视频喉镜宾得AWS(日本东京)进行喉镜检查和气管插管是否比使用麦金托什喉镜更容易。
在203例接受麻醉且手动保持颈部直线稳定的患者中,我们依次插入宾得AWS和麦金托什喉镜,记录声门的视野以及喉镜检查所需时间。还记录了气管插管成功率(120秒内)和插管时间。
宾得AWS观察声门的视野明显优于麦金托什喉镜(P<0.001)。对于麦金托什喉镜,203例患者中有22例(11%)视野受阻(21例为3级,1例为4级),而对于宾得AWS,总能清晰看到声门(1级)。使用宾得AWS看到声门的时间[均值(标准差):6.0(3.1)秒]明显短于使用麦金托什喉镜的时间[11.0(5.0)秒](差异的95%置信区间:4 - 6秒)。使用宾得AWS进行气管插管的成功率(99例患者全部成功)明显高于使用麦金托什喉镜的成功率(104例患者中的93例)(P = 0.001)。麦金托什喉镜的插管时间[51(27)秒]与宾得AWS的插管时间[54(14)秒]相似(差异的95%置信区间:-9至3秒)。
在颈部稳定的患者中,与传统的麦金托什喉镜相比,宾得AWS能提供更好的声门视野和更高的气管插管成功率。