Suppr超能文献

对报告有青霉素过敏的患者进行产时B族链球菌预防。

Intrapartum group B streptococci prophylaxis in patients reporting a penicillin allergy.

作者信息

Matteson Kristen A, Lievense Stacey P, Catanzaro Bethany, Phipps Maureen G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, the Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):356-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318160ff9d.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine adherence to the 2002 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for group B streptococci (GBS) prophylaxis in patients who reported a penicillin allergy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of GBS-positive, penicillin-allergic obstetric patients who delivered at our institution from 2004 through 2005 (N=233). Medical records were analyzed for type of delivery, gestational age at delivery, antimicrobial sensitivity testing, and antibiotics administered. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing and appropriate prophylactic antibiotic choice were analyzed. "Appropriate antibiotic choice" was defined using the 2002 CDC guidelines for GBS prophylaxis. Women with either a scheduled cesarean delivery or a preterm delivery were excluded from analyses. Data were analyzed using Stata 9.0.

RESULTS

Overall, 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-97%) of GBS-positive, penicillin-allergic women received antibiotic prophylaxis and only 16% (95% CI 11-21%) of patients received an appropriate antibiotic. The majority of women who were given antibiotics received clindamycin (83%, 95% CI 77-87%); however, antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed in only 11% (95% CI 9-17%) of patients. More women received an appropriate antibiotic in 2005 than in 2004 (20% compared with 11%, P=0.11). Although the study was underpowered to evaluate the magnitude of increase, the overall prevalence of appropriate antibiotic administration in 2005 was still only 20% (95% CI 13-28%).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the 2002 CDC guidelines for GBS prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic women is far from optimal. Improvements are necessary in obtaining antimicrobial sensitivity testing and choosing an appropriate antibiotic for GBS-positive women with a reported penicillin allergy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

研究报告有青霉素过敏史的患者对2002年美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)预防B族链球菌(GBS)指南的遵循情况。

方法

这是一项对2004年至2005年在我院分娩的GBS阳性且对青霉素过敏的产科患者的回顾性队列研究(N = 233)。分析病历中的分娩类型、分娩时的孕周、抗菌药敏试验及使用的抗生素。对抗菌药敏试验及适当预防性抗生素的选择进行分析。“适当抗生素选择”依据2002年CDC预防GBS指南定义。计划剖宫产或早产的女性被排除在分析之外。使用Stata 9.0进行数据分析。

结果

总体而言,95%(95%置信区间[CI] 91 - 97%)的GBS阳性且对青霉素过敏的女性接受了抗生素预防,仅有16%(95% CI 11 - 21%)的患者接受了适当的抗生素。大多数接受抗生素治疗的女性使用了克林霉素(83%,95% CI 77 - 87%);然而,仅11%(95% CI 9 - 17%)的患者进行了抗菌药敏试验。2005年接受适当抗生素治疗的女性比2004年更多(20%对比11%,P = 0.11)。尽管该研究评估增加幅度的效能不足,但2005年适当抗生素使用的总体患病率仍仅为20%(95% CI 13 - 28%)。

结论

对有青霉素过敏史的女性遵循2002年CDC预防GBS指南的情况远未达到最佳。在为报告有青霉素过敏的GBS阳性女性进行抗菌药敏试验及选择适当抗生素方面有必要加以改进。

证据级别

II级

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验