Zhang Jie, Lester David
Central University of Finance and Economics, School of Social Development, Beijing, China.
Arch Suicide Res. 2008;12(1):67-73. doi: 10.1080/13811110701800962.
As a comprehensive and parsimonious theory explaining the socio-psychological mechanism prior to suicidal behavior, strain theory of suicide postulates that conflicting and competing pressures in an individual's life usually precede a suicide. The theory proposes four sources of strain leading to suicide: (1) value strain from conflicting values, (2) aspiration strain from the discrepancy between aspiration and reality, (3) deprivation strain from relative deprivation such as poverty, and (4) coping strain from deficient coping skills in the face of a crisis. This research has content-analyzed 40 suicide notes (20 by suicide completers and 20 by suicide attempters) and found strong support for the strain theory of suicide. Although little difference is found in the number and pattern of strains between the completers and attempters, both groups have many aspirations and coping strains and few value and deprivation strains. Also, the older a suicidal victim is, the more he/she feels deprived and lacks coping skills and feels less bothered with value conflicts. Although the study has offered some support for the new theory, future research with more rigorous quantitative data needs to be conducted to further test the theory on a more comprehensive level.
作为一种解释自杀行为之前社会心理机制的全面且简洁的理论,自杀压力理论假定个体生活中相互冲突和竞争的压力通常先于自杀行为出现。该理论提出了导致自杀的四种压力源:(1)来自相互冲突价值观的价值压力;(2)来自期望与现实差异的期望压力;(3)来自如贫困等相对剥夺的剥夺压力;(4)面对危机时因应对技能不足产生的应对压力。本研究对40份自杀遗书(20份来自自杀成功者,20份来自自杀未遂者)进行了内容分析,发现有力支持了自杀压力理论。尽管在自杀成功者和自杀未遂者之间,压力的数量和模式差异不大,但两组都有许多期望压力和应对压力,而价值压力和剥夺压力较少。此外,自杀受害者年龄越大,他/她越感到被剥夺,缺乏应对技能,且对价值冲突的困扰越少。尽管该研究为这一新理论提供了一些支持,但需要进行更严格定量数据的未来研究,以在更全面的层面进一步检验该理论。