Vahratian Anjel, Patel Divya A, Wolff Kristen, Xu Xiao
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0276, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):103-11. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0391.
The authors examined college students' perceptions regarding emergency contraception (EC) provision in light of the then pending U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision about the over-the-counter (OTC) status of EC.
We randomly sampled 7000 male and female students who were enrolled full-time at the University of Michigan during the winter 2006 semester. A total of 1585 (22.6%) students responded to our web-based survey and were included in these descriptive analyses.
Nearly all (94%) respondents knew of EC. When asked whether EC should be made available OTC, 60% of respondents agreed, 23% disagreed, and 17% were unsure. If EC were to be made available OTC, 34% of respondents indicated that they (or their partner) would purchase EC in advance of need, and 44% stated that they would purchase it only after unprotected sexual intercourse or contraceptive failure. Advance discussion and provision of EC is underused. Only 10% of all female respondents indicated that their current healthcare provider had spoken to them about EC in a routine health visit, and just 5% of female respondents were offered a supply of EC in advance of need.
Continued efforts are needed to ensure timely access to EC in this population.
鉴于当时美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于紧急避孕药(EC)非处方(OTC)状态的待定决定,作者研究了大学生对提供紧急避孕药的看法。
我们随机抽取了2006年冬季学期在密歇根大学全日制注册的7000名男女学生。共有1585名(22.6%)学生回复了我们的网络调查,并被纳入这些描述性分析。
几乎所有(94%)的受访者都知道紧急避孕药。当被问及紧急避孕药是否应设为非处方药时,60%的受访者表示同意,23%表示不同意,17%不确定。如果紧急避孕药成为非处方药,34%的受访者表示他们(或其伴侣)会在有需要之前购买紧急避孕药,44%表示他们只会在无保护性行为或避孕失败后才购买。提前讨论和提供紧急避孕药的情况未得到充分利用。在所有女性受访者中,只有10%表示其当前的医疗保健提供者在常规健康检查中与她们谈论过紧急避孕药,只有5%的女性受访者在有需要之前得到了紧急避孕药的供应。
需要持续努力以确保该人群能够及时获得紧急避孕药。