Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉瘤修复的知情同意:通过全国性调查评估外科医生意见的差异。

Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: assessing variations in surgeon opinion through a national survey.

作者信息

Berman Loren, Dardik Alan, Bradley Elizabeth H, Gusberg Richard J, Fraenkel Liana

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.050.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Informed consent discussions for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair should reflect appropriate risks of the open or endovascular repair (EVAR), but few guidelines exist describing what surgeons should discuss. This study examines expert opinion regarding what constitutes informed consent.

METHODS

Design. We conducted an anonymous, web-based, national survey of vascular surgeons. Associations between surgeon characteristics and opinions regarding informed consent were measured using bivariate statistics; multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate effects adjusted for covariates. Setting. Academic and private practice surgeons were surveyed. Subjects. United States members of the International Society for Vascular Surgery membership. Main Outcome Measure. Surgeons' self-reported opinions regarding the content of informed consent for AAA repair.

RESULTS

A total of 199 surgeons completed the survey (response rate 51%). More than 90% of respondents reported that it was essential to discuss mortality risk for both procedures. However, only 60% and 30% of respondents reported that it was essential to discuss the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively. Opinions varied by procedure regarding the risks of impotence (32% vs 62%; EVAR vs open repair), reintervention (78% vs 17%), and rupture during long-term follow-up (57% vs 17%). Younger and private practice surgeons were more likely to discuss complications compared with older surgeons and those in academic practice. Surgeons who perform predominantly EVAR were more likely to quote higher mortality rates for open repair (odds ration [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-6.4) and lower reintervention rates for EVAR (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1-0.7) compared with other surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study of the practice of informed consent for AAA repair. The only risk that the vast majority of surgeons agreed should be included in informed consent for AAA repair was mortality. Significant variation exists regarding whether other complications should be discussed and what complication rates should be quoted. Surgeon characteristics may influence how risks are presented to patients. Further efforts are needed to develop guidelines to ensure consistent communication of appropriate risk during informed consent for AAA repair.

摘要

目的

对于择期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术的知情同意讨论应反映开放手术或血管腔内修复术(EVAR)的适当风险,但描述外科医生应讨论内容的指南很少。本研究探讨了关于构成知情同意的专家意见。

方法

设计。我们对血管外科医生进行了一项基于网络的全国性匿名调查。使用双变量统计方法测量外科医生特征与关于知情同意的意见之间的关联;进行多变量逻辑回归以估计经协变量调整后的效应。背景。对学术和私人执业外科医生进行了调查。研究对象。国际血管外科学会美国会员。主要观察指标。外科医生对AAA修复术知情同意内容的自我报告意见。

结果

共有199名外科医生完成了调查(回复率51%)。超过90%的受访者表示,讨论两种手术的死亡风险至关重要。然而,分别只有60%和30%的受访者表示讨论心肌梗死和中风风险至关重要。对于阳痿风险(32%对62%;EVAR对开放手术)、再次干预风险(78%对17%)以及长期随访期间破裂风险(57%对17%),不同手术的意见存在差异。与年长外科医生和学术执业外科医生相比,年轻和私人执业外科医生更有可能讨论并发症。与其他外科医生相比,主要进行EVAR手术的外科医生更有可能报出开放手术更高的死亡率(优势比[OR]=3.1,95%置信区间[CI]=1.4 - 6.4)和EVAR更低的再次干预率(OR = 0.3,95%CI = 0.1 - 0.7)。

结论

这是第一项关于AAA修复术知情同意实践的研究。绝大多数外科医生一致认为应纳入AAA修复术知情同意的唯一风险是死亡率。对于是否应讨论其他并发症以及应报出何种并发症发生率存在显著差异。外科医生特征可能会影响向患者呈现风险的方式。需要进一步努力制定指南,以确保在AAA修复术知情同意过程中一致地传达适当风险。

相似文献

2
Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The patient's perspective.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Aug;48(2):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.037. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
3
Stress testing before abdominal aortic aneurysm repair does not lead to a reduction in perioperative cardiac events.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.032. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
The effect of hospital factors on mortality rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.111. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Late outcomes after endovascular and open repair of large abdominal aortic aneurysms.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
The impact of race and insurance type on the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.033. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

2
A survey of doctors at a UK teaching hospital to assess understanding of recent changes to consent law.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Apr 21;18:10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.04.013. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
A clinical and ethical review on late results and benefits after EVAR.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Feb 20;16:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.006. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
Content, accuracy and completeness of patient consent in a regional vascular surgery unit.
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;184(2):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1160-x. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
6
P5 medicine: a plus for a personalized approach to oncology.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 May 31;8(7):444. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.227-c1.
7
Limitations of online information on abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Int J Vasc Med. 2010;2010:789198. doi: 10.1155/2010/789198. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
8
Pilot testing of a decision support tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;53(2):285-92.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.075. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
9
Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The patient's perspective.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Aug;48(2):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.037. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Informed consent in cardiac surgery: is it truly informed?
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 Sep;7(9):675-81. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000243001.59675.bf.
4
Patients' values and clinical substituted judgments: the case of localized prostate cancer.
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S85-92. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S85.
6
A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1607-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042002.
7
Quality of life endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomised trial.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;27(2):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.006.
9
Clinical practice. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1895-901. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp012641.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验