Goldstein Jay L, Eisen Glenn M, Lewis Blair, Gralnek Ian M, Zlotnick Steve, Fort John G
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Feb;3(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00619-6.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data indicate that cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors cause less gastroduodenal mucosal damage than nonspecific NSAIDS, but their effects on the small bowel mucosa are less well recognized. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) we prospectively evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in healthy subjects treated with celecoxib compared to naproxen plus omeprazole.
We randomly assigned subjects with normal baseline VCEs to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n = 120), naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 118), or placebo (n = 118) for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject.
Baseline VCE found small bowel lesions in 13.8% (57/413) of screened subjects, who became ineligible for randomization. The mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject and the percentage of subjects with these mucosal breaks were 2.99 +/- 0.51, 55% for naproxen/omeprazole compared to 0.32 +/- 0.10, 16% for celecoxib and 0.11 +/- 0.04, 7% for placebo (P < .001, both comparisons). The magnitude of the difference between celecoxib and placebo was small but statistically significant (P = .04).
Among healthy subjects with lesion-free baseline VCEs, celecoxib was associated with significantly fewer small bowel mucosal breaks than naproxen plus omeprazole. This study also showed that the background incidence of small bowel lesions in healthy adults is not insignificant and should be considered in future trials with VCE.
数据表明,与非特异性非甾体抗炎药相比,环氧化酶-2特异性抑制剂对胃十二指肠黏膜的损伤较小,但它们对小肠黏膜的影响却鲜为人知。在一项采用视频胶囊内镜(VCE)的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,我们前瞻性评估了与萘普生加奥美拉唑相比,塞来昔布治疗的健康受试者小肠损伤的发生率。
我们将基线VCE正常的受试者随机分为三组,分别给予塞来昔布200mg每日两次(n = 120)、萘普生500mg每日两次加奥美拉唑20mg每日一次(n = 118)或安慰剂(n = 118),治疗2周。主要终点是每位受试者小肠黏膜破损的平均数。
基线VCE在13.8%(57/413)的筛查受试者中发现小肠病变,这些受试者不符合随机分组条件。每位受试者小肠黏膜破损的平均数及出现这些黏膜破损的受试者百分比,萘普生/奥美拉唑组分别为2.99±0.51、55%,塞来昔布组为0.32±0.10、16%,安慰剂组为0.11±0.04、7%(两组比较,P均<0.001)。塞来昔布与安慰剂之间的差异幅度较小,但具有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。
在基线VCE无病变的健康受试者中,塞来昔布导致的小肠黏膜破损明显少于萘普生加奥美拉唑。本研究还表明,健康成年人小肠病变的背景发生率并非微不足道,在未来VCE试验中应予以考虑。