Suppr超能文献

肩胛骨折延迟诊断的原因。

Causes of delayed diagnosis of scapular fractures.

作者信息

Tadros Ayman M A, Lunsjo Karl, Czechowski Jaunsz, Abu-Zidan Fikri M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Injury. 2008 Mar;39(3):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the causes of delayed diagnosis of scapular fractures in blunt trauma cases, and to advise on early fracture detection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2003 and September 2004, 64 consecutive patients (3 females) with a median (range) age of 35 (8-60) years, treated at Al-Ain Hospital for scapular fractures, were prospectively collected. Fractures diagnosed after more than 24h from admission were considered missed; 8 people with missed scapular fractures were compared with a control group of 56 who had timely diagnosis, regarding the mechanism and distribution of injury, injury severity score, and type and quality of radiological methods used.

RESULTS

The median (range) abbreviated injury scale scores for the missed scapular fracture group and the control group were 4 (0-5) and 2 (0-2), respectively. The missed scapular fracture group stayed significantly longer in the intensive care unit compared with the control group, with a median (range) stay of 15 (5-37) days compared with 9 (1-26) days. Associated injuries overshadowed the scapula on chest trauma radiographs. If computed tomography did not cover the whole scapula, some fractures might not be shown. Convulsive seizures were the only significantly different mechanism of injury between the missed fracture and the control groups.

CONCLUSION

Delayed diagnosis of scapular fractures can be due to extensive chest injuries overshadowing the scapula on the chest trauma radiographs, inappropriately performed computer tomography or an unusual mechanism of injury.

摘要

目的

研究钝性创伤病例中肩胛骨骨折延迟诊断的原因,并就早期骨折检测提供建议。

患者与方法

2003年2月至2004年9月期间,前瞻性收集了在艾因医院接受治疗的64例连续肩胛骨骨折患者(3例女性),年龄中位数(范围)为35岁(8 - 60岁)。入院后超过24小时诊断出的骨折被视为漏诊;将8例漏诊肩胛骨骨折的患者与56例及时诊断的对照组患者在损伤机制与分布、损伤严重程度评分以及所使用的放射学检查方法的类型和质量方面进行比较。

结果

漏诊肩胛骨骨折组和对照组的简明损伤定级量表评分中位数(范围)分别为4(0 - 5)和2(0 - 2)。与对照组相比,漏诊肩胛骨骨折组在重症监护病房的停留时间明显更长,停留时间中位数(范围)为15天(5 - 37天),而对照组为9天(1 - 26天)。胸部创伤X线片上,合并伤掩盖了肩胛骨。如果计算机断层扫描未覆盖整个肩胛骨,可能无法显示某些骨折。抽搐发作是漏诊骨折组与对照组之间唯一显著不同的损伤机制。

结论

肩胛骨骨折延迟诊断可能是由于胸部创伤X线片上广泛的胸部损伤掩盖了肩胛骨、计算机断层扫描执行不当或损伤机制异常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验