Suppr超能文献

透析治疗方式的经济学评估。

Economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities.

作者信息

Just Paul Michael, Riella Miguel Carlos, Tschosik Elizabeth Ann, Noe Leslie Lyle, Bhattacharyya Samir Kumar, de Charro Frank

机构信息

Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 1620 Waukegan Road, MPGR-A2E, McGaw Park, IL 60085, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):163-80. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to review published economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities, including hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in both PubMed and EMBASE for the years 1996-2006. Articles were included if they were original research articles comparing PD and HD or comparing subtypes of PD and HD.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included in the formal literature review. The majority of articles were cost evaluations, rather than full economic evaluations of both costs and outcomes. The results show that, in developed nations, HD is generally more expensive than PD to the payer. In developing and emerging economies, mainly due to inexpensive labor and high imported equipment and solution costs, PD is not infrequently perceived to be more expensive than HD. However, the costs of dialysis differ by region and additional research is needed particularly in developing economies.

CONCLUSIONS

HD is a more expensive dialysis modality in developed regions of the world. Research in the developing world is too limited to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

目的

本文旨在综述已发表的关于透析治疗方式的经济学评估,包括血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)。

方法

于1996年至2006年在PubMed和EMBASE中进行了系统的文献综述。纳入的文章需为比较PD和HD或比较PD和HD亚型的原创性研究文章。

结果

正式文献综述纳入了25篇文章。大多数文章是成本评估,而非对成本和结果的全面经济学评估。结果表明,在发达国家,对于支付方而言,HD通常比PD成本更高。在发展中经济体和新兴经济体中,主要由于劳动力成本低廉以及进口设备和溶液成本高昂,PD常常被认为比HD成本更高。然而,透析成本因地区而异,尤其在发展中经济体,还需要更多研究。

结论

在世界发达地区,HD是成本更高的透析方式。发展中世界的研究过于有限,无法得出明确结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验