Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 1;58(2):214. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020214.
Kidney transplantation (KT) is recognized as the gold-standard of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that receiving a pre-emptive KT ensures the best recipient and graft survivals. However, due to an overwhelming discrepancy between the organs available and the patients on the transplant waiting list, the vast majority of transplant candidates require prolonged periods of dialysis before being transplanted. For many years, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have been considered competitive renal replacement therapies (RRT). This dualistic vision has recently been questioned by evidence suggesting that an individualized and flexible approach may be more appropriate. In fact, tailored and cleverly planned changes between different RRT modalities, according to the patient's needs and characteristics, are often needed in order to achieve the best results. While home HD is still under scrutiny in this particular setting, current data seems to favor the use of PD over in-center HD in patients awaiting a KT. In this specific population, the demonstrated advantages of PD are superior quality of life, longer preservation of residual renal function, lower incidence of delayed graft function, better recipient survival, and reduced cost.
肾移植(KT)被认为是治疗终末期肾病患者的金标准。此外,已经证明,接受抢先性 KT 可以确保最佳的受者和移植物存活率。然而,由于可供器官与移植等待名单上的患者之间存在巨大差异,绝大多数移植候选人在接受移植之前需要长时间进行透析。多年来,腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)一直被认为是竞争性肾脏替代疗法(RRT)。最近,有证据表明,个体化和灵活的方法可能更为合适,这种二元观点受到了质疑。事实上,根据患者的需求和特点,在不同的 RRT 模式之间进行定制和巧妙的计划改变通常是必要的,以达到最佳效果。虽然家庭血液透析在这种特殊情况下仍在受到审查,但目前的数据似乎倾向于在等待 KT 的患者中使用 PD 而不是中心血液透析。在这一特定人群中,PD 的优势包括更高的生活质量、更长的残余肾功能保留、更低的延迟移植物功能障碍发生率、更好的受者存活率和更低的成本。