Suppr超能文献

探讨药物、心理社会和替代/补充干预措施对儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的影响:荟萃回归分析。

Exploring the Effects of Pharmacological, Psychosocial, and Alternative/Complementary Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Regression Approach.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Oct 23;24(10):776-786. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab034.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been various therapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but the previous meta-analysis of ADHD efficacy remains unclear. This study aims to systemically meta-regress the effect sizes (ES) of psychostimulant pharmacotherapy (methylphenidate and lisdexamfetamine), non-stimulant pharmacotherapy (atomoxetine and alpha-2 agonists), psychosocial therapy (parental behavioral therapy [PBT]), combination therapy (psychostimulant plus PBT), and alternative/complementary interventions to determine the right treatment for ADHD.

METHODS

We searched various ADHD interventions from the MEDLINE and PubMed databases (National Center for Biotechnology Information) between January 1, 1980, and July 30, 2018. Following the meta-analysis of random effects, the meta-regression analyses were used to explore factors potentially influencing treatment efficacy. The confounding variables included type of treatment, type of study, age, type of symptom scale used, and year of publication.

RESULTS

A total of 107 trials (n = 9883 participants) were included. After adjustment, compared with the psychostimulant therapy (28 trial, 2134 participants), non-stimulant pharmacotherapy (28 trials, 4991 participants) and alternative/complement intervention (25 trials, 1195 participants) were less effective by the ES of -0.384 (P = .004) and -0.419 (P = .028), respectively. However, compared with psychostimulant, PBT (19 trials, 1122 participants; ES = -0.308, P = .095) and the combination of psychostimulant and PBT (7 trials, 441participants; ES = -0.196, P = .209) did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychostimulant therapy surpassed non-stimulant pharmacotherapy and alternative/complement intervention. Psychostimulant therapy, PBT, and the combination of psychostimulant therapy and PBT appear to be similar in efficacy according to this meta-regression.

摘要

背景

针对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),已经有各种治疗方法,但之前关于 ADHD 疗效的荟萃分析仍然不明确。本研究旨在系统地对精神兴奋剂药物治疗(哌醋甲酯和右旋苯丙胺)、非兴奋剂药物治疗(托莫西汀和α-2 激动剂)、心理社会治疗(父母行为治疗[PBT])、联合治疗(精神兴奋剂加 PBT)和替代/补充干预的效应大小(ES)进行荟萃回归分析,以确定 ADHD 的正确治疗方法。

方法

我们从 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 30 日,在 MEDLINE 和 PubMed 数据库(美国国家生物技术信息中心)中搜索了各种 ADHD 干预措施。在进行随机效应荟萃分析后,使用荟萃回归分析来探讨可能影响治疗效果的因素。混杂变量包括治疗类型、研究类型、年龄、使用的症状量表类型和发表年份。

结果

共纳入 107 项试验(n=9883 名参与者)。调整后,与精神兴奋剂治疗(28 项试验,2134 名参与者)相比,非兴奋剂药物治疗(28 项试验,4991 名参与者)和替代/补充干预(25 项试验,1195 名参与者)的疗效分别差 0.384(P=0.004)和 0.419(P=0.028)。然而,与精神兴奋剂相比,PBT(19 项试验,1122 名参与者;ES=-0.308,P=0.095)和精神兴奋剂与 PBT 的联合治疗(7 项试验,441 名参与者;ES=-0.196,P=0.209)差异无统计学意义。

结论

精神兴奋剂治疗优于非兴奋剂药物治疗和替代/补充干预。根据这项荟萃回归分析,精神兴奋剂治疗、PBT 和精神兴奋剂治疗与 PBT 的联合治疗在疗效上似乎相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe1e/8538900/b212395a5576/pyab034f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验