Suppr超能文献

中重度肾功能损害的冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的晚期透析率:非体外循环与传统方法的比较

Late dialysis rate for coronary artery bypass grafting patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment: comparison between off-pump and conventional method.

作者信息

Yu Hsi-Yu, Li Jiun-Yi, Sun Shen, Hung Kuan-Yu, Wang Jaw-Lin, Chen Yih-Sharng, Wang Shoei-Shen, Lin Fang-Yue

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Mar;33(3):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.027. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has a late renal protective advantage over conventional coronary arterial bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass use is controversial.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2004, 2102 cases of isolated coronary arterial bypass grafting were collected and analyzed, 1116 (53%) in the cardiopulmonary bypass group and 986 (47%) in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group. Cases were stratified by preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate into three renal groups: 1012 (48%) in group 1, with glomerular filtration rates > or =60 ml/h, 864 (41%) in group 2, with glomerular filtration rates of 30-60 ml/h, and 226 (10.8%) in group 3, with glomerular filtration rates <30 ml/h, but without dialysis before surgery.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mechanical renal replacement therapy rates were 2.0%, 4.6%, and 26.1%, respectively, for the three renal groups that underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass, and 1.1%, 3.4%, and 14.0%, respectively for the three renal groups that underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. After risk adjustment, cardiopulmonary bypass use did not show statistical significance for in-hospital mechanical renal replacement therapy (p=0.314, 0.524, 0.150, respectively, across renal groups 1-3). At the end of the 4-year follow-up period, 99.1%, 97.2%, and 78.6%, respectively, of patients were free of mechanical renal replacement therapy across the three renal groups (p=0.0097 between renal groups 1 and 2; p<0.001 between renal groups 2 and 3). Cox regression analysis for renal groups 2 and 3 revealed that cardiopulmonary bypass use was not a risk factor for mid-term mechanical renal replacement therapy (p=0.452), but preoperative glomerular filtration rate, hypercholesterolemia, insulin-requiring diabetes, young age at surgery, female gender, and in-hospital mechanical renal replacement therapy use were.

CONCLUSION

Patient characteristics, rather than operative strategy of using off-pump or conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, influence the mid-term mechanical renal replacement therapy rate for patients with glomerular filtration rates <60 ml/min.

摘要

背景

与使用体外循环的传统冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术是否具有晚期肾脏保护优势存在争议。

方法

收集并分析1997年至2004年期间2102例单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术病例,体外循环组1116例(53%),非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术组986例(47%)。根据术前估计肾小球滤过率将病例分为三个肾脏组:第1组1012例(48%),肾小球滤过率≥60 ml/h;第2组864例(41%),肾小球滤过率为30 - 60 ml/h;第3组226例(10.8%),肾小球滤过率<30 ml/h,但术前未进行透析。

结果

接受传统体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的三个肾脏组的院内机械性肾脏替代治疗率分别为2.0%、4.6%和26.1%,接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的三个肾脏组分别为1.1%、3.4%和14.0%。风险调整后,使用体外循环对院内机械性肾脏替代治疗未显示统计学意义(第1 - 3个肾脏组的p值分别为0.314、0.524、0.150)。在4年随访期结束时,三个肾脏组分别有99.1%、97.2%和78.6%的患者未进行机械性肾脏替代治疗(第1组和第2组之间p = 0.0097;第2组和第3组之间p<0.001)。对第2组和第3组进行Cox回归分析显示,使用体外循环不是中期机械性肾脏替代治疗的危险因素(p = 0.452),但术前肾小球滤过率、高胆固醇血症、需胰岛素治疗的糖尿病、手术时年龄小、女性以及使用院内机械性肾脏替代治疗是危险因素。

结论

对于肾小球滤过率<60 ml/min的患者,影响中期机械性肾脏替代治疗率的是患者特征,而非使用非体外循环或传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的手术策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验