Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease is found to be the primary cause of mortality, and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), their prognosis deteriorates.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis comparing off-pump CABG versus on-pump CABG in CKD patients. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords. We included studies comparing off-pump CABG with on-pump CABG in patients with chronic kidney disease, which was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m. Effect estimates were synthesized using a random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcome was short-term mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies, of which 23 were observational and 2 were RCTs, were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 234,585 patients (66,591 in the off-pump group and 167,994 in the on-pump group). Our meta-analysis showed that there was a significantly higher mortality rate in the on-pump CABG group as compared to the off-pump CABG group (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]; P = 0.0006, I = 60%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with OPCAB, short-term mortality was significantly higher in ONCAB.