Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌高分辨率动态磁共振特征与预后因素的相关性

Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer.

作者信息

Lee Shin Ho, Cho Nariya, Kim Seung Ja, Cha Joo Hee, Cho Kyung Soo, Ko Eun Sook, Moon Woo Kyung

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Chongno-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;9(1):10-8. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To correlate high resolution dynamic MR features with prognostic factors in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and ninety-four women with invasive ductal carcinomas underwent dynamic MR imaging using T1-weighted three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (3D-FLASH) sequence within two weeks prior to surgery. Morphological and kinetic MR features were determined based on the breast imaging and reporting data system (BI-RADS) MR imaging lexicon. Histological specimens were analyzed for tumor size, axillary lymph node status, histological grade, expression of estrogen receptor (ER), expression of progesterone receptor (PR), and expression of p53, c-erbB-2, and Ki-67. Correlations between the MR features and prognostic factors were determined using the Pearson chi(2) test, linear-by-linear association, and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

By multivariate analysis, a spiculated margin was a significant, independent predictor of a lower histological grade (p < 0.001), and lower expression of Ki-67 (p = 0.007). Rim enhancement was significant, independent predictor of a higher histological grade (p < 0.001), negative expression of ER (p = 0.001), negative expression of PR (p < 0.001) and a larger tumor size (p = 0.006). A washout curve may predict a higher level of Ki-67 (p = 0.05). Most of the parameters of the initial enhancement phase cannot predict the status of the prognostic factors. Only the enhancement ratio may predict a larger tumor size (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Of the BI-RADS-MR features, a spiculated margin may predict favorable prognosis, whereas rim enhancement or washout may predict unfavorable prognosis of breast cancer.

摘要

目的

将乳腺癌的高分辨率动态磁共振成像(MR)特征与预后因素相关联。

材料与方法

194例浸润性导管癌女性患者在手术前两周内采用T1加权三维快速低角度激发(3D-FLASH)序列进行动态MR成像。基于乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)MR成像词典确定形态学和动力学MR特征。对组织学标本分析肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结状态、组织学分级、雌激素受体(ER)表达、孕激素受体(PR)表达以及p53、c-erbB-2和Ki-67的表达。采用Pearson卡方检验、线性-线性关联和逻辑回归分析确定MR特征与预后因素之间的相关性。

结果

多因素分析显示,毛刺状边缘是组织学分级较低(p<0.001)和Ki-67表达较低(p = 0.007)的显著独立预测因素。边缘强化是组织学分级较高(p<0.001)、ER阴性表达(p = 0.001)、PR阴性表达(p<0.001)和肿瘤较大(p = 0.006)的显著独立预测因素。廓清曲线可能预示Ki-67水平较高(p = 0.05)。初始强化期的大多数参数不能预测预后因素的状态。只有强化率可能预测肿瘤较大(p = 0.05)。

结论

在BI-RADS-MR特征中,毛刺状边缘可能预示预后良好,而边缘强化或廓清可能预示乳腺癌预后不良。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f21d/2627175/54104cad6850/kjr-9-10-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation between high resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Korean J Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;9(1):10-8. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.10.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors.
Acta Radiol. 2009 Nov;50(9):990-8. doi: 10.3109/02841850903225180.
3
Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
Correlation of MRI features and pathohistological prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Acta Clin Belg. 2017 Oct;72(5):306-312. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2016.1266432. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
5
Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.
Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2425-35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2000-y. Epub 2003 Jul 26.
8

引用本文的文献

1
3
[Early Recurrence of Breast Cancer after the Primary Treatment: Analysis of Clinicopathological and Radiological Predictive Factors].
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2020 Mar;81(2):395-408. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.2.395. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Computer-Aided Diagnosis Parameters of Invasive Carcinoma of No Special Type on 3T MRI: Correlation with Pathologic Immunohistochemical Markers.
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022 Jan;83(1):149-161. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0061. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):490. doi: 10.3390/life12040490.
6
Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.
Br J Radiol. 2022 Apr 1;95(1132):20210466. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210466. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
7
Correlation of DCE-MRI Perfusion Parameters and Molecular Biology of Breast Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma.
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 13;11:561735. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.561735. eCollection 2021.
8
Current State of Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Theranostics.
Pharmaceutics. 2021 May 14;13(5):723. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050723.
9
Can enhancement types on preoperative MRI reflect prognostic factors and surgical outcomes in invasive breast cancer?
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):7000-7008. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06236-2. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.
Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2425-35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2000-y. Epub 2003 Jul 26.
6
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999 Aug;31(3):209-23. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(99)00034-7.
9
Contrast-enhanced MR imaging as a prognostic indicator of breast cancer.
Acta Radiol. 1998 May;39(3):279-84. doi: 10.1080/02841859809172195.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验