Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌增强型锥形束 CT 特征与预后分期的相关性。

Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China, China.

Department of Medical Imaging, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2022 Apr 1;95(1132):20210466. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210466. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) features can risk-stratify prognostic stage in breast cancer.

METHODS

Overall, 168 biopsy-proven breast cancer patients were analysed: 115 patients in the training set underwent scanning using v. 1.5 CE-CBBCT between August 2019 and December 2019, whereas 53 patients in the test set underwent scanning using v. 1.0 CE-CBBCT between May 2012 and August 2014. All patients were restaged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition prognostic staging system. Following the combination of CE-CBBCT imaging parameters and clinicopathological factors, predictors that were correlated with stratification of prognostic stage via logistic regression were analysed. Predictive performance was assessed according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Goodness-of-fit of the models was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

As regards differentiation between prognostic stage (PS) I and II/III, increased tumour-to-breast volume ratio (TBR), rim enhancement pattern, and the presence of penetrating vessels were significant predictors for PS II/III disease ( < 0.05). The AUCs in the training and test sets were 0.967 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.938-0.996; < 0.001] and 0.896 (95% CI, 0.809-0.983; = 0.001), respectively. Two features were selected in the training set of PS II III, including tumour volume [odds ratio (OR)=1.817, = 0.019] and calcification (OR = 4.600, = 0.040), achieving an AUC of 0.790 (95% CI, 0.636-0.944, = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the test set of PS II III (0.05).

CONCLUSION

CE-CBBCT imaging biomarkers may provide a large amount of anatomical and radiobiological information for the pre-operative distinction of prognostic stage.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

CE-CBBCT features have distinctive promise for stratification of prognostic stage in breast cancer.

摘要

目的

评估对比增强锥形束乳腺 CT(CE-CBBCT)特征能否对乳腺癌的预后分期进行风险分层。

方法

共分析了 168 例经活检证实的乳腺癌患者:115 例患者在训练集中于 2019 年 8 月至 12 月接受 v.1.5CE-CBBCT 扫描,而 53 例患者在测试集中于 2012 年 5 月至 2014 年 8 月接受 v.1.0CE-CBBCT 扫描。所有患者均根据美国癌症联合委员会第八版预后分期系统重新分期。在结合 CE-CBBCT 成像参数和临床病理因素后,通过逻辑回归分析与预后分期分层相关的预测因素。根据受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)评估预测性能。通过 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验评估模型的拟合优度。

结果

在区分预后分期(PS)I 期和 II/III 期方面,肿瘤与乳房体积比(TBR)增加、边缘强化模式和穿透血管的存在是 PS II/III 疾病的显著预测因子(<0.05)。训练集和测试集的 AUC 分别为 0.967[95%置信区间(CI)0.938-0.996;<0.001]和 0.896(95%CI,0.809-0.983;=0.001)。在 PS II/III 的训练集中选择了两个特征,包括肿瘤体积[比值比(OR)=1.817,=0.019]和钙化(OR=4.600,=0.040),AUC 为 0.790(95%CI,0.636-0.944,=0.001)。然而,在 PS II/III 的测试集中差异无统计学意义(0.05)。

结论

CE-CBBCT 成像生物标志物可为术前区分预后分期提供大量解剖学和放射生物学信息。

知识进展

CE-CBBCT 特征有望对乳腺癌的预后分期进行分层。

相似文献

1
Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.
Br J Radiol. 2022 Apr 1;95(1132):20210466. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210466. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3731-3741. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5376-4. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
4
Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5773-5782. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08699-2. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer.
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2731-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06587-w. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1194-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5711-9. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
CT values of contrast-enhanced CBBCT: A useful diagnostic tool for benign and malignant breast lesions.
Acta Radiol. 2023 Aug;64(8):2379-2386. doi: 10.1177/02841851231177379. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Feb;99:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10

本文引用的文献

2
OXPHOS-dependent metabolic reprogramming prompts metastatic potential of breast cancer cells under osteogenic differentiation.
Br J Cancer. 2020 Nov;123(11):1644-1655. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01040-y. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Radiogenomic Analysis of Breast Cancer by Using B-Mode and Vascular US and RNA Sequencing.
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):24-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191368. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Correction to: Elevated expression of CST1 promotes breast cancer progression and predicts a poor prognosis.
J Mol Med (Berl). 2019 Aug;97(8):1213-1214. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01806-9.
6
Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review.
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):288-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323.
7
Prognostic influence of 3-dimensional tumor volume on breast cancer compared to conventional 1-dimensional tumor size.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Oct;95(4):183-191. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.4.183. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Relationships Between Human-Extracted MRI Tumor Phenotypes of Breast Cancer and Clinical Prognostic Indicators Including Receptor Status and Molecular Subtype.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):467-472. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1194-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5711-9. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验