Suppr超能文献

用于维持克罗恩病缓解的肿瘤坏死因子-α抗体。

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

作者信息

Behm B W, Bickston S J

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD006893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006893.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease may be refractory to conventional treatments including corticosteroids and immunosuppressives. Recent studies suggest TNF-alpha blocking agents may be effective in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of the evidence for the effectiveness of TNF-alpha blocking agents in the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the IBD/FBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register were searched for relevant studies published between 1966-2007. Manual searches of references from potentially relevant papers were performed to identify additional studies. Experts in the field and study authors were contacted to identify unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials involving patients > 18 years with Crohn's disease who had a clinical response or clinical remission with a TNF-alpha blocking agent, or patients with Crohn's disease in remission but unable to wean corticosteroids, who were then randomized to maintenance of remission with a TNF-alpha blocking agent or placebo

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors performed data extraction and assessment of the methodological quality of each trial. Outcome measures reported in the primary studies included clinical remission, clinical response, and steroid-sparing effects.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies met all inclusion criteria. Four different anti-TNF-alpha agents were evaluated (infliximab in 3 studies, CDP571 in 3 studies, adalimumab in 2 studies, and certolizumab in 1 study). There is evidence from three randomized controlled trials that infliximab maintains clinical remission (RR 2.50; 95% CI 1.64 to 3.80), maintains clinical response (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.76), has corticosteroid-sparing effects (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.25 to 7.81), and maintains fistula healing (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.04) in patients with Crohn's disease with a response to infliximab induction therapy. There were no significant differences in remission rates between infliximab doses of 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg. There is evidence from two randomized controlled trials that adalimumab maintains clinical remission (RR 2.86; 95% CI 2.01 to 4.02), maintains clinical response (RR 2.69; 95% CI 1.88 to 3.86), and has corticosteroid-sparing effects (RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.46 to 5.43) in patients with Crohn's disease who have responded or entered remission with adalimumab induction therapy. There were no significant differences in remission rates between adalimumab 40 mg weekly or every other week. There is evidence from one randomized controlled trial that certolizumab pegol maintains clinical remission (RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.16) and maintains clinical response (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.41 to 2.13) in patients who have responded to certolizumab induction therapy. There is no evidence to support the use of CDP571 for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, given every 8 weeks, is effective for the maintenance of remission and maintenance of fistula healing in patients who have responded to infliximab induction therapy. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly or every other week is effective for the maintenance of remission in patients who have responded to adalimumab induction therapy. Certolizumab pegol 400 mg every 4 weeks is effective for the maintenance of remission in patients who have responded to certolizumab induction therapy. No comparative trials have evaluated the relative efficacy of these agents. Adverse events are similar in the infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab groups compared with placebo, but study size and duration generally are insufficient to allow an adequate assessment of serious adverse events associated with long-term use.

摘要

背景

克罗恩病可能对包括皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂在内的传统治疗方法产生耐药性。最近的研究表明,肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)阻断剂可能对维持克罗恩病的缓解有效。

目的

对TNF-α阻断剂在维持克罗恩病患者缓解方面有效性的证据进行系统评价。

检索策略

检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库以及炎症性肠病/功能性肠病综述组专业试验注册库,查找1966年至2007年间发表的相关研究。对潜在相关论文的参考文献进行手工检索,以识别其他研究。联系该领域的专家和研究作者,以识别未发表的数据。

入选标准

随机对照试验,受试者为年龄大于18岁的克罗恩病患者,这些患者对TNF-α阻断剂有临床反应或临床缓解,或者处于缓解期但无法停用皮质类固醇的克罗恩病患者,然后将他们随机分为用TNF-α阻断剂或安慰剂维持缓解。

数据收集与分析

两名独立作者进行数据提取并评估每个试验的方法学质量。主要研究中报告的结局指标包括临床缓解、临床反应和类固醇节省效应。

主要结果

9项研究符合所有纳入标准。评估了4种不同的抗TNF-α药物(英夫利昔单抗3项研究、CDP571 3项研究、阿达木单抗2项研究、赛妥珠单抗1项研究)。三项随机对照试验的证据表明,英夫利昔单抗可维持临床缓解(RR 2.50;95%CI 1.64至3.80)、维持临床反应(RR 1.66;95%CI 1.00至2.76)、具有类固醇节省效应(RR 3.13;95%CI 1.25至7.81),并能维持对英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗有反应的克罗恩病患者的瘘管愈合(RR 1.87;95%CI 1.15至3.04)。5mg/kg或10mg/kg剂量的英夫利昔单抗缓解率无显著差异。两项随机对照试验的证据表明,阿达木单抗可维持对阿达木单抗诱导治疗有反应或已进入缓解期的克罗恩病患者的临床缓解(RR 2.86;95%CI 2.01至4.02)、维持临床反应(RR 2.69;95%CI 1.88至3.86)以及具有类固醇节省效应(RR 2.81,95%CI 1.46至5.43)。40mg每周一次或每两周一次的阿达木单抗缓解率无显著差异。一项随机对照试验的证据表明,赛妥珠单抗可维持对赛妥珠单抗诱导治疗有反应的患者的临床缓解(RR 1.68;95%CI 1.30至2.16)和维持临床反应(RR 1.74;95%CI 1.41至2.13)。没有证据支持使用CDP571维持克罗恩病的缓解。

作者结论

每8周给予5mg/kg或10mg/kg的英夫利昔单抗,对已对英夫利昔单抗诱导治疗有反应的患者维持缓解和维持瘘管愈合有效。每周一次或每两周一次给予40mg的阿达木单抗,对已对阿达木单抗诱导治疗有反应的患者维持缓解有效。每4周给予400mg的赛妥珠单抗,对已对赛妥珠单抗诱导治疗有反应的患者维持缓解有效。尚无比较试验评估这些药物的相对疗效。与安慰剂相比,英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和赛妥珠单抗组的不良事件相似,但研究规模和持续时间通常不足以充分评估与长期使用相关的严重不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验