García-Lerma J Gerardo, Otten Ron A, Qari Shoukat H, Jackson Eddie, Cong Mian-Er, Masciotra Silvina, Luo Wei, Kim Caryn, Adams Debra R, Monsour Michael, Lipscomb Jonathan, Johnson Jeffrey A, Delinsky David, Schinazi Raymond F, Janssen Robert, Folks Thomas M, Heneine Walid
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050028.
In the absence of an effective vaccine, HIV continues to spread globally, emphasizing the need for novel strategies to limit its transmission. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs could prove to be an effective intervention strategy if highly efficacious and cost-effective PrEP modalities are identified. We evaluated daily and intermittent PrEP regimens of increasing antiviral activity in a macaque model that closely resembles human transmission.
We used a repeat-exposure macaque model with 14 weekly rectal virus challenges. Three drug treatments were given once daily, each to a different group of six rhesus macaques. Group 1 was treated subcutaneously with a human-equivalent dose of emtricitabine (FTC), group 2 received orally the human-equivalent dosing of both FTC and tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and group 3 received subcutaneously a similar dosing of FTC and a higher dose of tenofovir. A fourth group of six rhesus macaques (group 4) received intermittently a PrEP regimen similar to group 3 only 2 h before and 24 h after each weekly virus challenge. Results were compared to 18 control macaques that did not receive any drug treatment. The risk of infection in macaques treated in groups 1 and 2 was 3.8- and 7.8-fold lower than in untreated macaques (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008, respectively). All six macaques in group 3 were protected. Breakthrough infections had blunted acute viremias; drug resistance was seen in two of six animals. All six animals in group 4 that received intermittent PrEP were protected.
This model suggests that single drugs for daily PrEP can be protective but a combination of antiretroviral drugs may be required to increase the level of protection. Short but potent intermittent PrEP can provide protection comparable to that of daily PrEP in this SHIV/macaque model. These findings support PrEP trials for HIV prevention in humans and identify promising PrEP modalities.
在缺乏有效疫苗的情况下,HIV仍在全球范围内传播,这凸显了需要新策略来限制其传播。如果能确定高效且具成本效益的暴露前预防(PrEP)模式,使用抗逆转录病毒药物进行暴露前预防可能会成为一种有效的干预策略。我们在一个与人类传播情况极为相似的猕猴模型中评估了具有递增抗病毒活性的每日和间歇性PrEP方案。
我们使用了一个重复暴露的猕猴模型,每周进行14次直肠病毒攻击。三种药物治疗方案每天给药一次,每种方案分别给予不同组的6只恒河猴。第1组皮下注射人等效剂量的恩曲他滨(FTC),第2组口服人等效剂量的FTC和替诺福韦酯富马酸盐(TDF),第3组皮下注射类似剂量的FTC和更高剂量的替诺福韦。第四组6只恒河猴(第4组)仅在每周病毒攻击前2小时和攻击后24小时间歇性接受与第3组类似的PrEP方案。结果与18只未接受任何药物治疗的对照猕猴进行比较。第1组和第2组接受治疗的猕猴感染风险分别比未治疗的猕猴低3.8倍和7.8倍(p分别为0.02和0.008)。第3组的所有6只猕猴均受到保护。突破性感染的急性病毒血症较弱;6只动物中有2只出现耐药性。接受间歇性PrEP的第4组的所有6只动物均受到保护。
该模型表明,用于每日PrEP的单一药物可起到保护作用,但可能需要抗逆转录病毒药物联合使用以提高保护水平。在这个猴免疫缺陷病毒/猕猴模型中,短期但强效的间歇性PrEP可提供与每日PrEP相当的保护。这些发现支持在人类中进行HIV预防的PrEP试验,并确定了有前景的PrEP模式。