Nielsen S S, Toft N
Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Jun 22;129(3-4):217-35. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
Infections with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) can be latent for years without affecting the animal, but the animal may become infectious or clinical at some point. Diagnosis of paratuberculosis can be a challenge primarily in latent stages of the infection, and different diagnosis interpretations are usually required by the variety of decision makers. The objective of this paper was to provide a critical review of reported accuracies of ELISA tests, interferon-gamma assays (IFN-gamma) and faecal culture (FC) techniques used for diagnosis of three defined target conditions: MAP infected, MAP infectious and MAP affected animals. For each animal species, target condition and diagnostic test-type, sensitivities (Se) and specificities (Sp) were summarised based on a systematic, critical review of information in literature databases. The diagnostic test information often varied substantially for tests of the same type and make, particularly ELISA, which was the most frequently reported test-type. Comparison of the various tests accuracies was generally not possible, but stratification of test-evaluations by target condition improved the interpretation of the test accuracies. Infectious and affected animals can often be detected, but Se for infected animals is generally low. A main conclusion of the review was that the quality of design, implementation and reporting of evaluations of tests for paratuberculosis is generally poor. Particularly, there is a need for better correspondence between the study population and target population, i.e. the subjects chosen for test evaluation should reflect the distribution of animals in the population where the test is intended to be used.
鸟分枝杆菌副结核亚种(MAP)感染可能潜伏数年而不影响动物,但动物在某些时候可能会具有传染性或出现临床症状。副结核的诊断主要在感染的潜伏阶段可能具有挑战性,并且不同的决策者通常需要不同的诊断解读。本文的目的是对用于诊断三种特定目标状态动物的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试验、干扰素-γ检测(IFN-γ)和粪便培养(FC)技术的报道准确性进行批判性综述,这三种目标状态分别为:感染MAP的动物、具有MAP传染性的动物和受MAP影响的动物。对于每种动物物种、目标状态和诊断试验类型,基于对文献数据库信息的系统批判性综述,总结了敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。对于相同类型和品牌的试验,尤其是最常报道的ELISA试验类型,诊断试验信息往往差异很大。通常无法对各种试验的准确性进行比较,但按目标状态对试验评估进行分层可改善对试验准确性的解读。通常可以检测出具有传染性和受影响的动物,但感染动物的敏感性通常较低。该综述的一个主要结论是,副结核试验评估的设计、实施和报告质量总体较差。特别是,研究人群与目标人群之间需要更好地对应,即选择用于试验评估的受试者应反映该试验预期使用人群中动物的分布情况。