Suppr超能文献

希腊奶山羊和奶绵羊副结核病诊断中血清ELISA和粪便培养敏感性和特异性的贝叶斯估计

Bayesian estimation of sensitivity and specificity of serum ELISA and faecal culture for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in Greek dairy sheep and goats.

作者信息

Kostoulas P, Leontides L, Enøe C, Billinis C, Florou M, Sofia M

机构信息

Laboratory of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Animal Health Economics, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, GR-43100 Karditsa, Greece.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2006 Sep 15;76(1-2):56-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

Abstract

Latent class models were used to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and the specificity (Sp) of a serum ELISA and a faecal culture (FC) method for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis separately, in sheep and goats. The estimates were obtained by a Bayesian method. Possible dependence of diagnostic errors was investigated by comparing models where independence was assumed to models allowing for conditional dependence given the true disease status. ROC analysis for the serum ELISA was also performed and optimized cut-off values based on the misclassification cost term were determined. No evidence of conditional dependence was found. Assuming independence, posterior medians and 95% credible intervals for the Se(ELISA), Sp(ELISA), Se(FC) and Sp(FC), were 63% (42, 93%), 95% (90, 98%), 8% (2, 17%) and 98% (95, 100%) in goats and 37% (10, 80%), 97% (93, 99%), 16% (2, 48%) and 97% (95, 99%) in sheep. AUC was calculated 0.702 for sheep and 0.847 for goats. For the serum ELISA, there is need of species- and purpose-specific cut-off selection. For instance, with 20% prevalence situation and assuming equal and five-fold cost of a false negative to a false positive test result, the optimal cut-off is 0.3 and 0.05 in sheep, respectively, while it is 0.6 and 0.1 in goats, respectively. Serum ELISA performed better in goats than in sheep. Lowering the cut-off, in relation to the one recommended by the manufacturer, improved Se(ELISA) without seriously compromising Sp(ELISA), in either species.

摘要

潜在类别模型用于分别估计绵羊和山羊中血清酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和粪便培养(FC)方法诊断副结核病的敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。这些估计值通过贝叶斯方法获得。通过比较假定独立的模型与考虑给定真实疾病状态下条件依赖性的模型,研究了诊断错误的可能依赖性。还对血清ELISA进行了ROC分析,并确定了基于误分类成本项的优化临界值。未发现条件依赖性的证据。假设独立,山羊中Se(ELISA)、Sp(ELISA)、Se(FC)和Sp(FC)的后验中位数及95%可信区间分别为63%(42,93%)、95%(90,98%)、8%(2,17%)和98%(95,100%),绵羊中分别为37%(10,80%)、97%(93,99%)、16%(2,48%)和97%(95,99%)。绵羊的曲线下面积(AUC)计算为0.702,山羊为0.847。对于血清ELISA,需要根据物种和目的选择特定的临界值。例如,在患病率为20%的情况下,假设假阴性与假阳性检测结果的成本相等且假阴性成本是假阳性的五倍,绵羊的最佳临界值分别为0.3和0.05,而山羊分别为0.6和0.1。血清ELISA在山羊中的表现优于绵羊。相对于制造商推荐的临界值降低临界值,在两个物种中均提高了Se(ELISA),且未严重损害Sp(ELISA)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验