Introduction of a UV-damaged replicon into a recipient cell is not a sufficient condition to produce an SOS-inducing signal.

Three models have been proposed for the nature of the SOS-inducing signal in E. coli. One model postulates that degradation products of damaged DNA generate an SOS-inducing signal; another model surmises that the very lesions produced by UV damage constitute the SOS-inducing signal in vivo; a third model proposes that DNA damage is processed upon DNA replication to form single-stranded DNA (the SOS signal) that activates RecA protein. We tested the models by measuring SOS induction produced by introducing into recipient cells the UV-damaged DNA of 2 constructed phagemids. We used phagemids since they transferred DNA to the recipients with 100% efficiency. The origin of replication of the phagemids was either oriC from the E. coli chromosome, or oriF from F plasmid. Replication of the oriC phagemid was dependent on methylation. A UV-damaged oriC phagemid failed to induce SOS functions in a recipient cell whereas an oriF phagemid did induce them. Our results disprove the first and the second model proposed for the nature of the SOS-inducing signal. The failure of a UV-damaged oriC replicon to induce SOS can be explained by the third model if one assumes that replication of a UV-damaged oriC plasmid does not generate single-stranded DNA as does the E. coli chromosome after UV damage.