• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对情绪刺激的识别增强。

Enhanced recognition of emotional stimuli in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

作者信息

Kano Fumihiro, Tanaka Masayuki, Tomonaga Masaki

机构信息

Language and Intelligence Section, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, 484-8506, Japan.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):517-24. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0142-7. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-008-0142-7
PMID:18259786
Abstract

Humans often have a better memory of emotional events than neutral events. From the comparative-cognitive perspective, we explored the enhancement of recognition memory by emotion in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) using a serial probe recognition task. In this task, we sequentially presented a list of pictures to subjects and then tested their recognition of specific pictures from within the list. We selected pictures of aggressive chimpanzees as emotional stimuli and less tensed, relaxed chimpanzees as neutral stimuli. In Experiment 1, we gave four-item lists to two young chimpanzees; one showed significantly greater recognition of pictures depicting aggressive chimpanzees than neutral ones. In Experiment 2, this chimpanzee was further tested using a recognition task with eight-item lists. The subject again showed better recognition of emotional stimuli than neutral. Furthermore, the presence of an emotional stimulus in the list also facilitated recognition of the neutral item immediately following it. Overall, although only one of the two chimpanzees showed enhanced recognition memory by emotional stimuli, this is the first demonstration of such a response in the chimpanzee. The findings are discussed in comparison with those of human studies.

摘要

人类通常对情感事件的记忆比对中性事件的记忆更好。从比较认知的角度来看,我们使用连续探针识别任务,探究了情感对黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)识别记忆的增强作用。在这个任务中,我们向受试者依次呈现一系列图片,然后测试他们对列表中特定图片的识别能力。我们选择攻击性黑猩猩的图片作为情感刺激,选择不那么紧张、放松的黑猩猩图片作为中性刺激。在实验1中,我们给两只年轻的黑猩猩呈现四项列表;其中一只对描绘攻击性黑猩猩的图片的识别能力明显高于对中性图片的识别能力。在实验2中,使用八项列表的识别任务对这只黑猩猩进行了进一步测试。该受试者对情感刺激的识别能力再次高于对中性刺激的识别能力。此外,列表中情感刺激的存在也促进了对紧随其后的中性项目的识别。总体而言,虽然两只黑猩猩中只有一只表现出情感刺激增强了识别记忆,但这是首次在黑猩猩身上证明这种反应。我们将这些发现与人类研究的结果进行了比较讨论。

相似文献

1
Enhanced recognition of emotional stimuli in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对情绪刺激的识别增强。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):517-24. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0142-7. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
2
Auditory-visual intermodal matching based on individual recognition in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).基于个体识别的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)视听跨模态匹配
Anim Cogn. 2009 Oct;12 Suppl 1:S71-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0269-1. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
3
Matching vocalizations to vocalizing faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).在黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)中将发声与发声的面部进行匹配。
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):179-84. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0212-4. Epub 2004 Mar 10.
4
Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): role of exposure and impact on categorical perception.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对人类和黑猩猩面部的识别:接触的作用及其对范畴知觉的影响
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;121(6):1145-55. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1145.
5
Effect of species-specificity in auditory-visual intermodal matching in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)与人类在视听跨通道匹配中物种特异性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):160-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
An advantage for concavities in shape perception by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在形状感知中对凹面的优势。
Behav Processes. 2007 Jul;75(3):253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.028. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
7
Visual and auditory conditional position discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的视觉和听觉条件位置辨别
Behav Processes. 2009 Sep;82(1):90-4. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中快速情绪识别的负性偏差
Psychol Med. 2009 May;39(5):855-64. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004273. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: evidence for a right hemisphere advantage.黑猩猩对人类嵌合面孔的感知:右脑优势的证据。
Brain Cogn. 1993 Jan;21(1):111-22. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1008.
10
Recognition of pictorial representations by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对图片表征的识别。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):169-79. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0056-1. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual integration of bodily and facial emotion cues in chimpanzees and humans.黑猩猩和人类对身体及面部情绪线索的感知整合
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 18;3(2):pgae012. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae012. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Gaze into social bonds: Unlocking great ape emotions through eye-tracking.凝视社会纽带:通过眼动追踪解锁类人猿的情感
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 2;121(1):e2319953121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319953121. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Vocal functional flexibility in the grunts of young chimpanzees.幼年黑猩猩呼噜声中的发声功能灵活性
iScience. 2023 Aug 30;26(10):107791. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107791. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
4
Reciprocity: Different behavioural strategies, cognitive mechanisms and psychological processes.互惠性:不同的行为策略、认知机制和心理过程。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):284-301. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00394-5.
5
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?点探测任务测量情绪注意:在比较研究中是一种合适的测量方法吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1686-1717. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1.
6
Bonobos (Pan paniscus) show an attentional bias toward conspecifics' emotions.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)对同种个体的情绪表现出注意力偏向。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 5;113(14):3761-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522060113. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
7
Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit emotional responses to decision outcomes.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩会对决策结果表现出情绪反应。
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e63058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063058. Print 2013.
8
Brain response to affective pictures in the chimpanzee.黑猩猩对情感图片的大脑反应。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1342. doi: 10.1038/srep01342.