Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e63058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063058. Print 2013.
The interface between cognition, emotion, and motivation is thought to be of central importance in understanding complex cognitive functions such as decision-making and executive control in humans. Although nonhuman apes have complex repertoires of emotional expression, little is known about the role of affective processes in ape decision-making. To illuminate the evolutionary origins of human-like patterns of choice, we investigated decision-making in humans' closest phylogenetic relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). In two studies, we examined these species' temporal and risk preferences, and assessed whether apes show emotional and motivational responses in decision-making contexts. We find that (1) chimpanzees are more patient and more risk-prone than are bonobos, (2) both species exhibit affective and motivational responses following the outcomes of their decisions, and (3) some emotional and motivational responses map onto species-level and individual-differences in decision-making. These results indicate that apes do exhibit emotional responses to decision-making, like humans. We explore the hypothesis that affective and motivational biases may underlie the psychological mechanisms supporting value-based preferences in these species.
认知、情感和动机之间的相互作用被认为是理解人类复杂认知功能(如决策和执行控制)的核心。尽管非人类类人猿具有复杂的情感表达能力,但关于情感过程在类人猿决策中的作用知之甚少。为了阐明人类似的选择模式的进化起源,我们研究了人类最亲近的进化亲属,即黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)的决策过程。在两项研究中,我们考察了这些物种的时间偏好和风险偏好,并评估了它们在决策情境中是否表现出情感和动机反应。我们发现:(1) 黑猩猩比倭黑猩猩更有耐心,也更倾向于冒险;(2) 两个物种在做出决策后的结果中都表现出了情感和动机反应;(3) 一些情感和动机反应映射到了物种水平和个体差异的决策中。这些结果表明,类人猿确实会对决策做出情感反应,就像人类一样。我们探讨了这样一种假设,即情感和动机偏见可能是这些物种支持基于价值的偏好的心理机制的基础。