Jones Stephen, Williams Matthew
Department of Radiation Oncology, Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Med Dosim. 2008 Spring;33(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.002.
Direct Machine Parameter Optimization (DMPO) is a leaf segmentation program released as an optional item of the Pinnacle planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA); it is based on the principles of direct aperture optimization where the size, shape, and weight of individual segments are optimized to produce an intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) plan. In this study, we compare DMPO to the traditional method of IMRT planning, in which intensity maps are optimized prior to conversion into deliverable multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures, and we determine if there was any dosimetric improvement, treatment efficiency gain, or planning advantage provided by the use of DMPO. Eleven head-and-neck patients treated with IMRT had treatment plans generated using each optimization method. For each patient, the same planning parameters were used for each optimization method. All calculations were performed using Pinnacle version 7.6c software and treatments were delivered using a step-and-shoot IMRT method on a Varian 2100EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Each plan was assessed based on the calculation time, a conformity index, the composite objective value used in the optimization, the number of segments, monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. The results showed DMPO to be superior to the traditional optimization method in all areas. Considerable advantages were observed in the dosimetric quality of DMPO plans, which also required 32% less time to calculate, 42% fewer MUs, and 35% fewer segments than the conventional optimization method. These reductions translated directly into a 29% decrease in treatment times. While considerable gains were observed in planning and treatment efficiency, they were specific to our institution, and the impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and workflow will be dependent on the planning parameters, planning system, and linear accelerators used by a particular institution.
直接机器参数优化(DMPO)是作为Pinnacle计划系统(飞利浦放射肿瘤系统公司,加利福尼亚州米尔皮塔斯)的一个可选项目发布的叶分割程序;它基于直接孔径优化的原理,其中各个射野的大小、形状和权重被优化以生成调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划。在本研究中,我们将DMPO与传统的IMRT计划方法进行比较,在传统方法中,强度图在转换为可交付的多叶准直器(MLC)孔径之前进行优化,并且我们确定使用DMPO是否提供了任何剂量学改善、治疗效率提高或计划优势。11例接受IMRT治疗的头颈患者使用每种优化方法生成了治疗计划。对于每位患者,每种优化方法使用相同的计划参数。所有计算均使用Pinnacle 7.6c版本软件进行,治疗使用配备120叶Millennium MLC的瓦里安2100EX直线加速器上的静态调强放射治疗方法进行(瓦里安医疗系统公司,加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)。每个计划根据计算时间、适形指数、优化中使用的综合目标值、射野数、监测单位(MU)和治疗时间进行评估。结果表明DMPO在所有方面均优于传统优化方法。在DMPO计划的剂量学质量方面观察到了相当大的优势,与传统优化方法相比,其计算时间少32%,MU少42%,射野少35%。这些减少直接转化为治疗时间减少29%。虽然在计划和治疗效率方面观察到了相当大的提高,但它们特定于我们的机构,并且直接孔径优化对计划质量和工作流程的影响将取决于特定机构使用的计划参数、计划系统和直线加速器。