• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强放疗及叶片宽度对肝脏和肺部病变立体定向体部放疗的影响。

Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.

作者信息

Dvorak Pavel, Georg Dietmar, Bogner Joachim, Kroupa Bernhard, Dieckmann Karin, Pötter Richard

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1572-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.075.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.075
PMID:15817364
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study explored the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on stereotactic body RT (SBRT) of liver and lung lesions. Additionally, because target dose conformity can be affected by the leaf width of a multileaf collimator (MLC), especially for small targets and stereotactic applications, the use of a micro-MLC on "uniform intensity" conformal and intensity-modulated SBRT was evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The present study included 10 patients treated previously with SBRT in our institution (seven lung and three liver lesions). All patients were treated with 3 x 12 Gy prescribed to the 65% isodose level. The actual MLC-based conformal treatment plan served as the standard for additional comparison. In total, seven alternative treatment plans were made for each patient: a standard (actual) plan and an IMRT plan, both calculated with Helax TMS (Nucletron) using a pencil beam model; and a recalculated standard and a recalculated IMRT plan on Helax TMS using a point dose kernel approach. These four treatment plans were based on a standard MLC with 1-cm leaf width. Additionally, the following micro-MLC (central leaf width 3 mm)-based treatment plans were calculated with the BrainSCAN (BrainLAB) system: standard, IMRT, and dynamic arc treatments. For each treatment plan, various target parameters (conformity, coverage, mean, maximal, and minimal target dose, equivalent uniform doses, and dose-volume histogram), as well as organs at risk parameters (3 Gy and 6 Gy volume, mean dose, dose-volume histogram) were evaluated. Finally, treatment efficiency was estimated from monitor units and the number of segments for IMRT solutions.

RESULTS

For both treatment planning systems, no significant difference could be observed in terms of target conformity between the standard and IMRT dose distributions. All dose distributions obtained with the micro-MLC showed significantly better conformity values compared with the standard and IMRT plans using a regular MLC. Dynamic arc plans were characterized by the steepest dose gradient and thus the smallest V(6 Gy) values, which were on average 7% smaller than the standard plans and 20% lower than the IMRT plans. Although the Helax TMS IMRT plans show about 18% more monitor units than the standard plan, BrainSCAN IMRT plans require approximately twice the number of monitor units relative to the standard plan. All treatment plans optimized with a pencil beam model but recalculated with a superposition method showed significant qualitative, as well as quantitative, differences, especially with respect to conformity and the dose to organs at risk.

CONCLUSION

Standard conformal treatment techniques for SBRT could not be improved with inversely planned IMRT approaches. Dose calculation algorithms applied in optimization modules for IMRT applications in the thoracic region need to be based on the most accurate dose calculation algorithms, especially when using higher energy photon beams.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨调强放疗(IMRT)对肝脏和肺部病变立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的影响。此外,由于多叶准直器(MLC)的叶片宽度可能会影响靶区剂量适形度,特别是对于小靶区和立体定向应用,因此评估了在“均匀强度”适形和调强SBRT中使用微型MLC的情况。

方法与材料

本研究纳入了10例先前在我院接受SBRT治疗的患者(7例肺部病变和3例肝脏病变)。所有患者均接受3×12 Gy的剂量,处方剂量至65%等剂量线。基于实际MLC的适形治疗计划作为额外比较的标准。总共为每位患者制定了7种替代治疗计划:一个标准(实际)计划和一个IMRT计划,两者均使用铅笔束模型在Helax TMS(Nucletron)上计算;以及在Helax TMS上使用点剂量核方法重新计算的标准计划和重新计算的IMRT计划。这四种治疗计划基于叶片宽度为1 cm的标准MLC。此外,使用BrainSCAN(BrainLAB)系统计算了以下基于微型MLC(中心叶片宽度3 mm)的治疗计划:标准、IMRT和动态弧形治疗。对于每个治疗计划,评估了各种靶区参数(适形度、覆盖度、平均、最大和最小靶区剂量、等效均匀剂量和剂量体积直方图)以及危及器官参数(3 Gy和6 Gy体积、平均剂量、剂量体积直方图)。最后,根据IMRT方案的监测单位和射野段数估计治疗效率。

结果

对于两个治疗计划系统,标准剂量分布和IMRT剂量分布在靶区适形度方面未观察到显著差异。与使用常规MLC的标准计划和IMRT计划相比,所有使用微型MLC获得的剂量分布显示出明显更好的适形度值。动态弧形计划的特点是剂量梯度最陡,因此V(6 Gy)值最小,平均比标准计划小7%,比IMRT计划低20%。尽管Helax TMS IMRT计划的监测单位比标准计划多约18%,但BrainSCAN IMRT计划相对于标准计划需要的监测单位数量约为两倍。所有用铅笔束模型优化但用叠加方法重新计算的治疗计划在质量和数量上均显示出显著差异,特别是在适形度和危及器官的剂量方面。

结论

SBRT的标准适形治疗技术无法通过逆向计划的IMRT方法得到改善。用于胸部IMRT应用优化模块的剂量计算算法需要基于最准确的剂量计算算法,特别是在使用更高能量光子束时。

相似文献

1
Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.调强放疗及叶片宽度对肝脏和肺部病变立体定向体部放疗的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1572-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.075.
2
Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.不同叶宽多叶准直器的调强放射治疗:可实现剂量分布的比较
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.02.007. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
3
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.基于放射生物学指标的螺旋断层放射治疗与基于多叶准直器的调强放射治疗的治疗计划比较
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 7;52(13):3817-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011. Epub 2007 May 31.
4
Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).多叶准直器叶片宽度和计划靶区边界对调强立体定向放射外科(IMSRS)或调强放射治疗(IMSRT)治疗计划的影响。
Med Dosim. 2009 Summer;34(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.在调强放射治疗(IMRT)优化中使用生物学参数(等效均匀剂量(EUD)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP))治疗肝内肿瘤的益处。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 1;62(2):571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.033.
6
Implications of a high-definition multileaf collimator (HD-MLC) on treatment planning techniques for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a planning study.高清多叶准直器(HD-MLC)对立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗计划技术的影响:一项计划研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-22.
7
Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗中射束几何形状与强度图的同步优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):301-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
8
Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.使用加速穷举搜索策略开发适用于调强放射治疗的射束角度优化方法。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1325-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.007.
9
A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.一项关于使用传统准直器递送调强放射治疗计划用于前列腺癌治疗的可行性研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Apr 21;52(8):2147-56. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
10
Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost treatment on the lung-dose distributions for non-small-cell lung cancer.调强放射治疗作为一种补充治疗对非小细胞肺癌肺部剂量分布的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.012. Epub 2005 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of a novel VenusX orthogonal dual-layer multileaf collimator.一种新型维纳斯 X 正交双层多叶准直器的特性研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 May;25(5):e14357. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14357. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs.基于不同多叶准直器设计的前列腺癌调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗的剂量学评估研究。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2023 Mar;62(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Stereotactic body radiotherapy delivered with IMRT for oligometastatic regional lymph node metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-institutional study.
立体定向体部放疗联合调强放疗治疗肝细胞癌寡转移区域淋巴结转移:单中心研究。
J Radiat Res. 2020 Sep 8;61(5):776-783. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa067.
4
IMRT/VMAT dose distributions generated for and collimators and accelerators.针对不同的准直器和加速器生成的调强放射治疗/容积调强弧形治疗剂量分布。 (你提供的原文中“for and collimators and accelerators”部分内容缺失,我根据常见情况补充了“不同的”来使句子完整通顺,你可根据实际情况修改。)
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Flattening filter-free technique in volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy: A clinical comparison with the flattening filter technique.容积调强弧形放疗中用于肺部立体定向体部放疗的无均整器技术:与均整器技术的临床比较
Oncol Lett. 2018 Mar;15(3):3928-3936. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7809. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
6
Finer leaf resolution and steeper beam edges using a virtual isocentre in concurrence to PTV-shaped collimators in standard distance - a planning study.在标准距离下,使用虚拟等中心与PTV形准直器同时实现更精细的叶片分辨率和更陡的射束边缘——一项计划研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 25;12(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0826-8.
7
Dosimetric impact of multileaf collimator leaf width according to sophisticated grade of technique in the IMRT and VMAT planning for pituitary adenoma lesion.在垂体腺瘤病变的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划中,根据复杂技术等级,多叶准直器叶片宽度的剂量学影响
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22;7(47):78119-78126. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12974.
8
Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.多叶准直器特性和调强放射治疗技术在脑膜瘤及头颈部治疗中的影响
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 2;10:184. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0447-z.
9
Is 5 mm MMLC suitable for VMAT-based lung SBRT? A dosimetric comparison with 2.5 mm HDMLC using RTOG-0813 treatment planning criteria for both conventional and high-dose flattening filter-free photon beams.5毫米多叶准直器(MMLC)是否适用于基于容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)的肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)?使用RTOG-0813治疗计划标准,对传统和高剂量无 flattening filter光子束,将5毫米MMLC与2.5毫米高分辨率多叶准直器(HDMLC)进行剂量学比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Jul 8;16(4):112–124. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5415.
10
Clinical effect of multileaf collimator width on the incidence of late rectal bleeding after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma.多叶准直器宽度对局限性前列腺癌大剂量调强放疗后晚期直肠出血发生率的临床影响
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):156-61. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0873-9. Epub 2015 Jul 12.