Suppr超能文献

无痴呆的认知障碍——遗忘亚组的神经心理学和神经影像学特征

Cognitive impairment no dementia - neuropsychological and neuroimaging characterization of an amnestic subgroup.

作者信息

Jacova Claudia, Peters Kevin R, Beattie B Lynn, Wong Erick, Riddehough Andrew, Foti Dean, Scheltens Philip, Li David K B, Feldman Howard H

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(3):238-47. doi: 10.1159/000115848. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) describes individuals whose cognitive functioning falls below normal but who do not meet dementia criteria. An important goal within CIND is to identify subgroups that will predictably progress to Alzheimer disease. CIND with amnestic deficits has been associated with high risk of Alzheimer disease but has until now been investigated on a retrospective basis. In this study a prospectively defined amnestic CIND group was characterized on a detailed neuropsychological test battery and on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures.

METHODS

Amnestic CIND was defined as meeting at least 1 but not all DSM-IV-TR criteria for dementia, scoring > or =1 SD below norms on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed recall, having a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 and a Mini-Mental State Exam score > or =24. This cross-sectional study compared subjects meeting these criteria (n = 25) to age- and education-matched controls (n = 26). The neuropsychological battery included memory and nonmemory measures that were analyzed as continuous variables and dichotomized into impaired (> or =1 SD below controls) versus nonimpaired. MRI scans were evaluated with a global-brain volumetric measure [brain fractional ratio (BFR)] and with visually based medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) ratings.

RESULTS

Amnestic CIND had neuropsychological impairment in the episodic memory domain and also in nonmemory domains. There were 80% of CIND subjects with multidomain impairment. The most clear-cut nonmemory impairment was in the verbal ability domain, with 64% of subjects affected and a moderate effect size (d = 0.7). On MRI, BFR was lower (74.5 +/- 4.6 vs. 75.5 +/- 4.4) and MTA higher (72 vs. 38% with MTA > or =1) in CIND than in control subjects. BFR correlated with MTA (r = -0.45) and with a composite memory score (r = 0.296).

CONCLUSION

A prospective amnestic CIND grouping appears to identify individuals with a multidomain pattern of neuropsychological impairment and with both medial temporal lobe and global brain atrophy.

摘要

背景/目的:认知功能障碍但未患痴呆症(CIND)指认知功能低于正常水平但未达到痴呆症标准的个体。CIND的一个重要目标是识别可预测会进展为阿尔茨海默病的亚组。伴有遗忘缺陷的CIND与阿尔茨海默病的高风险相关,但迄今为止一直是基于回顾性研究。在本研究中,一个前瞻性定义的遗忘型CIND组通过详细的神经心理测试组合和结构磁共振成像(MRI)测量进行了特征描述。

方法

遗忘型CIND被定义为至少符合但未完全符合痴呆症的DSM-IV-TR标准,在雷伊听觉词语学习测验延迟回忆中得分比常模低≥1个标准差,临床痴呆评定量表评分为0.5,简易精神状态检查表得分≥24。这项横断面研究将符合这些标准的受试者(n = 25)与年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组(n = 26)进行了比较。神经心理测试组合包括记忆和非记忆测量,这些测量作为连续变量进行分析,并分为受损(比对照组低≥1个标准差)和未受损。MRI扫描通过全脑体积测量[脑分数比(BFR)]和基于视觉的内侧颞叶萎缩(MTA)评级进行评估。

结果

遗忘型CIND在情景记忆领域以及非记忆领域均存在神经心理损害。80%的CIND受试者存在多领域损害。最明显的非记忆损害出现在语言能力领域,64%的受试者受到影响,效应量中等(d = 0.7)。在MRI上,CIND组的BFR较低(74.5±4.6 vs. 75.5±4.4),MTA较高(MTA≥1的比例为72% vs. 38%)。BFR与MTA相关(r = -0.45),与综合记忆评分相关(r = 0.296)。

结论

前瞻性的遗忘型CIND分组似乎能够识别出具有多领域神经心理损害模式以及内侧颞叶和全脑萎缩的个体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验