Suppr超能文献

在单个移植中心对接受异基因造血干细胞移植的处于首次或第二次完全缓解期(CR1 与 CR2)的急性髓性白血病患儿的结局进行比较。

A comparison of the outcomes of children with acute myelogenous leukemia in either first or second complete remission (CR1 vs CR2) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at a single transplant center.

作者信息

Gassas A, Ishaqi M Kashif, Afzal S, Finkelstein-Shechter T, Dupuis A, Doyle J

机构信息

Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun;41(11):941-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.16. Epub 2008 Feb 11.

Abstract

We reviewed 70 consecutive children with AML who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in our institution between 1994 and 2005. Forty-seven children were transplanted in CR1 and 23 were transplanted in CR2. BU/CY was the most common pretransplant conditioning regimen for CR1 patients and a TBI-based conditioning regimen was the most common regimen for CR2 patients. Most patients transplanted in CR1 (81%) received related donor HSCT, whereas most of the CR2 patients (74%) received unrelated donor HSCT. Expectedly, there was a significant increase in acute GVHD incidence in CR2 patients (40 vs 25% for grades I-II and 30 vs 10% for grades III-IV; P=0.02) and a significant increase in transplant-related mortality (38 vs 11%; P=0.01). Although the difference between 3-year EFS for CR1 and CR2 was not statistically significant, there was a significantly superior 3-year overall survival for CR1 patients (74 vs 51%; P=0.05). Children with relapsed AML who achieve and maintain remission until HSCT, have a reasonable survival, but the outcome of children receiving HSCT in CR1 remains superior.

摘要

我们回顾了1994年至2005年间在我院接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的70例连续性急性髓系白血病(AML)患儿。47例患儿在首次完全缓解(CR1)期接受移植,23例在第二次完全缓解(CR2)期接受移植。白消安/环磷酰胺(BU/CY)是CR1期患者最常用的移植前预处理方案,而基于全身照射(TBI)的预处理方案是CR2期患者最常用的方案。大多数在CR1期接受移植的患者(81%)接受了相关供体的HSCT,而大多数CR2期患者(74%)接受了无关供体的HSCT。不出所料,CR2期患者的急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率显著增加(I-II级为40%对25%,III-IV级为30%对10%;P=0.02),移植相关死亡率也显著增加(38%对(11%);P=0.01)。虽然CR1期和CR2期的3年无事件生存率(EFS)差异无统计学意义,但CR1期患者的3年总生存率显著更高(74%对51%;P=0.05)。复发AML患儿在HSCT前实现并维持缓解,有合理的生存率,但CR1期接受HSCT的患儿结局仍更优。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验