de Berranger E, Cousien A, Petit A, Peffault de Latour R, Galambrun C, Bertrand Y, Salmon A, Rialland F, Rohrlich P-S, Vannier J-P, Lutz P, Yakouben K, Duhamel A, Bruno B, Michel G, Dalle J-H
Pediatric Hematology Department, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHRU Lille, Lille, France.
EA 2694, Faculté de Médecine, Lille, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Mar;49(3):382-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.185. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) appears to be an efficient tool to cure high-risk AML in first CR but the choice between BU-based or TBI-based conditioning regimens still remains controversial. In order to analyze the impact of conditioning regimen on long-term survival, we conducted a retrospective analysis from French registry data including all consecutive patients under 18 years old (n=226) from 1980 to 2004 transplanted for AML in CR1 from sibling (n=142) or matched unrelated donors and given either TBI-1200 cGy and CY 120 mg/kg (TBI-Cy, n=84) or BU 16 mg/kg and CY 200 mg/kg (BuCy200, n=142). Patient subgroups were comparable for all criteria except for median age at diagnosis and HSCT and for donor type. Both 5-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly better in BuCy200 group (P=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both HLA matching and BuCy200 appeared as good prognostic factors for treatment-related mortality and DFS. Grade 2-4 acute GvHD and chronic GvHD rates were statistically higher in TBI-Cy group than in Bu-Cy200 one with a RR at 2 (P=0.002). In total, Bu-Cy200 conditioning regimen gives better outcome compared with TBI-Cy irrespective of the stem cell source and the donor type.
异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)似乎是治愈首次完全缓解(CR)的高危急性髓系白血病(AML)的有效手段,但基于白消安(BU)或基于全身照射(TBI)的预处理方案之间的选择仍存在争议。为了分析预处理方案对长期生存的影响,我们对法国登记处的数据进行了回顾性分析,纳入了1980年至2004年间所有18岁以下连续接受移植的AML患者(n = 226),这些患者均处于CR1期,供者为同胞(n = 142)或匹配的无关供者,并接受了1200 cGy的TBI和120 mg/kg的环磷酰胺(CY)(TBI-Cy,n = 84)或16 mg/kg的BU和200 mg/kg的CY(BuCy200,n = 142)。除诊断时和HSCT时的中位年龄以及供者类型外,患者亚组在所有标准上均具有可比性。BuCy200组的5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)均显著更好(P分别为0.02和0.005)。在多变量分析中,HLA匹配和BuCy200均显示为与治疗相关死亡率和DFS的良好预后因素。TBI-Cy组2-4级急性移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)和慢性GvHD发生率在统计学上高于Bu-Cy200组,相对危险度为2(P = 0.002)。总体而言,无论干细胞来源和供者类型如何,Bu-Cy200预处理方案的结局均优于TBI-Cy。