Suppr超能文献

含丁香酚的临时修复体对复合树脂与牙本质粘结强度的影响。

Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin.

作者信息

Yap A U, Shah K C, Loh E T, Sim S S, Tan C C

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Centre for Biomedical Materials Applications and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):556-61.

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Thirty-two freshly extracted human molars were embedded and horizontally sectioned at a level 2 mm from the central fossa to obtain a flat dentin surface. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of eight teeth. Specimens in Group 1 (control) received no pre-treatment with any temporary restorations. Group 2 and 3 specimens were covered with IRM (eugenol-containing) mixed at powder: liquid (P:L) ratio of 10 g: 1 g and 10 g: 2 g, respectively. Specimens in Group 4 were covered with polycarboxylate cement (eugenol-free) mixed at a P:L ratio of 2.85 g: 1 g. The temporary restorations were mechanically removed with an ultrasonic scaler after one-week storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C. The dentin surfaces were cleaned with pumice-water slurry and treated with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus bonding system according to manufacturer's instructions. Composite (Z100) columns (3 mm diameter, 2 mm high) were applied and shear bond testing was carried out after 24 hours storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C using an Instron Universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The mode of failure was examined using a stereomicroscope at X40 magnification. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffes's post-hoc test at significance level 0.05. Ranking of bond strengths was as follows: Group 1 (22.58 MPa) > Group 2 (21.14 MPa) > Group 4 (15.35 MPa) > Group 3 (13.02 MPa). Group 3 had significantly lower bond strength than Groups 1 and 2. No significant difference in dentin bond strength was observed between the Group 1 (control) and Groups 2 and 4. Although the predominant mode of failure for Groups 1, 2 and 4 was cohesive in dentin, all specimens in Group 3 exhibited adhesive failure. Pre-treatment with polycarboxylate cement or IRM mixed at P:L ratio of 10 g: 1 g did not affect shear bond strength of composite to dentin. IRM mixed at a lower P:L ratio of 10 g: 2 g significantly decreased bond strength.

摘要

本研究调查了含丁香酚的临时修复体对复合材料与牙本质粘结强度的影响。将32颗新鲜拔除的人类磨牙包埋,并在距中央窝2mm处水平切片,以获得平坦的牙本质表面。将牙齿随机分为四组,每组8颗。第1组(对照组)的标本未用任何临时修复体进行预处理。第2组和第3组的标本分别用粉末与液体(P:L)比例为10g:1g和10g:2g混合的IRM(含丁香酚)覆盖。第4组的标本用P:L比例为2.85g:1g混合的聚羧酸锌水门汀(不含丁香酚)覆盖。在37℃蒸馏水中储存一周后,用超声洁牙机机械去除临时修复体。用浮石 - 水浆清洁牙本质表面,并根据制造商的说明用Scotchbond多功能增强粘结系统进行处理。施加复合材料(Z100)柱(直径3mm,高2mm),并在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时后,使用Instron万能试验机以0.5mm/分钟的十字头速度进行剪切粘结测试。使用放大倍数为40倍的体视显微镜检查失败模式。结果采用单因素方差分析/谢费尔事后检验进行分析,显著性水平为0.05。粘结强度排名如下:第1组(22.58MPa)>第2组(21.14MPa)>第4组(15.35MPa)>第3组(13.02MPa)。第3组的粘结强度明显低于第1组和第2组。在第1组(对照组)与第2组和第4组之间未观察到牙本质粘结强度的显著差异。尽管第1组、第2组和第4组的主要失败模式是牙本质内聚性破坏,但第3组的所有标本均表现为粘结性破坏。用聚羧酸锌水门汀或P:L比例为10g:1g混合的IRM预处理不影响复合材料与牙本质的剪切粘结强度。P:L比例为10g:2g的较低比例混合的IRM显著降低了粘结强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验